首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >CREATING A CROSS-WALK BETWEEN TWO COMMONLY USED PROXY-BASED MEASURES OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: IQCODE AND AD8
【2h】

CREATING A CROSS-WALK BETWEEN TWO COMMONLY USED PROXY-BASED MEASURES OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: IQCODE AND AD8

机译:在两种常用的基于代理的认知障碍措施之间创建跨行:IQCODE和AD8

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in Elderly (IQCODE) and the Alzheimer’s Disease 8 (AD8) are proxy-based assessments for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia that are particularly useful when direct cognitive testing of patients is not possible, such as during delirium. The IQCODE consists of 16 Likert questions, while the AD8 consists of 8 yeso questions and is briefer to administer. We aimed to develop a crosswalk of scores between these measures, and to use established IQCODE cutoffs for MCI and for dementia to define similar cutoffs for AD8. We administered both the IQCODE and AD8 to proxies of enrolled hospitalized patients from two medical centers. We used equipercentile equating to develop the crosswalk of scores between the two instruments. The study sample consisted of 151 patients, with mean age 79 ± 11 years, 55% female. Of the proxies, 47% lived with the patient, and included 34% spouses, 50% children/children-in-law, and 16% other. We equated AD8 and IQCODE scores with good precision (standard error=0.04) throughout the range of cognitive decline (3.0–5.0 for IQCODE, 0–8 for AD8). Previously established cut-off scores of 3.2 for MCI and 3.5 for dementia on the IQCODE equated to scores of 2 for MCI and 4 for dementia on the AD8. Our results suggest that the previously published AD8 cut-off score of 2 for dementia might be overly sensitive, and a cut-off of 4 should be considered. Our results will enable researchers and clinicians to more directly compare studies using these two proxy-based cognitive measures.
机译:老年人认知能力下降知情调查表(IQCODE)和阿尔茨海默氏病8(AD8)是基于代理的轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症评估,在无法对患者进行直接认知测试时(例如在谵妄。 IQCODE包含16个李克特问题,而AD8包含8个是/否问题,而且管理起来比较简单。我们的目标是在这些方法之间建立分数交叉,并使用既定的IQCODE临界值用于MCI和痴呆症,以定义AD8的相似临界值。我们对来自两个医疗中心的住院患者的代理进行了IQCODE和AD8的管理。我们使用等分百分数等式发展了两种工具之间的分数交叉。该研究样本包括151名患者,平均年龄为79±11岁,女性为55%。在代理中,有47%与患者同住,包括34%的配偶,50%的儿童/-妇和16%的其他人。在认知能力下降的整个范围内(IQCODE为3.0–5.0,AD8为0–8),我们将AD8和IQCODE分数均具有良好的精确度(标准误= 0.04)。先前在IQCODE上建立的MCI截止得分为3.2,痴呆的得分为3.5,在AD8上等于MCI的得分为2,痴呆的得分为4。我们的结果表明,先前发表的痴呆症的AD8临界值2可能过于敏感,应该考虑临界值4。我们的结果将使研究人员和临床医生可以使用这两种基于代理的认知方法更直接地比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号