首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders >Comparison of 2 informant questionnaire screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: AD8 and IQCODE
【24h】

Comparison of 2 informant questionnaire screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: AD8 and IQCODE

机译:两种痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的线人问卷筛选工具的比较:AD8和IQCODE

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are underrecognized in community settings. This may be due in part to the lack of brief dementia screening tools available to clinicians. We compared 2 brief, informant-based screening tests: the AD8 and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) in a community-based neurology practice in the midwestern United States. METHODS:: We examined 186 consecutive patients (44 controls, 13 with MCI, and 129 with dementia). Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to examine the ability of AD8 and IQCODE to discriminate between controls and MCI or dementia. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were reported. RESULTS:: AD8 differentiated healthy controls from MCI (P<0.001) or dementia (P<0.001), and MCI from dementia (P=0.008). The IQCODE differentiated controls and MCI from dementia (both P<0.001), and between controls and MCI (P=0.002). Both AD8 (AUC=0.953; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.99) and IQCODE (AUC=0.930, 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97) provided discrimination between controls and patients with dementia; however, the AD8 had superior sensitivity detecting dementia (99.2%) and MCI (100%) compared with the IQCODE (79.1% for dementia, 46.1% for MCI) with nonoverlapping confidence intervals. Using published cut-offs (AD8≥2, IQCODE≥3.4), only 1 case of dementia was missed with the AD8, whereas the IQCODE failed to detect dementia in 27 individuals. The AD8 detected MCI in all 13 individuals, whereas the IQCODE misclassified 7 individuals. CONCLUSIONS:: Both the AD8 and IQCODE were able to detect dementia in a community setting. The AD8, however, was more successful than IQCODE in detecting MCI. If simple and efficient screening for early cognitive impairment is the goal, particularly in the early stages (eg, for prevention trials or public screening), the combination of an informant interview (the AD8) and a brief performance measure could be considered as they meet the basic requirements of the Personalized Prevention Plan for Medicare beneficiaries.
机译:背景:社区环境中对痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的认识不足。这可能部分是由于缺乏可供临床医生使用的简短痴呆筛查工具。我们在美国中西部一个基于社区的神经病学实践中比较了两种基于知情者的简短筛查测试:AD8和老年人认知能力下降知情问卷(IQCODE)。方法:我们检查了186例连续患者(44例对照,13例MCI和129例痴呆)。接收者操作员特征曲线用于检查AD8和IQCODE区分对照和MCI或痴呆症的能力。报告了敏感性,特异性,预测值和似然比。结果:AD8区分健康对照者与MCI(P <0.001)或痴呆(P <0.001),以及MCI与痴呆(P = 0.008)。 IQCODE区分了对照和MCI与痴呆(均P <0.001)以及对照和MCI之间(P = 0.002)。 AD8(AUC = 0.953; 95%置信区间,0.92-0.99)和IQCODE(AUC = 0.930,95%置信区间,0.88-0.97)都提供了对对照组和痴呆患者的区分;但是,与IQCODE(痴呆症为79.1%,MCI为46.1%)相比,AD8在检测痴呆症(99.2%)和MCI(100%)方面具有更高的灵敏度,并且没有重叠的置信区间。使用已公布的临界值(AD8≥2,IQCODE≥3.4),AD8仅漏诊了1例痴呆症,而IQCODE未能在27个人中检测到痴呆症。 AD8在所有13个人中检测到MCI,而IQCODE对7个人进行了错误分类。结论:AD8和IQCODE都能够在社区环境中检测到痴呆症。但是,AD8在检测MCI方面比IQCODE更成功。如果目标是对早期认知障碍进行简单有效的筛查,尤其是在早期阶段(例如,进行预防试验或公共筛查),则可以考虑将知情人访谈(AD8)和简短的绩效评估相结合医疗保险受益人个性化预防计划的基本要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号