首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society >Effect of Preparation Taper Height and Marginal Design Under Varying Occlusal Loading Conditions on Cement Lute Stress: A Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
【2h】

Effect of Preparation Taper Height and Marginal Design Under Varying Occlusal Loading Conditions on Cement Lute Stress: A Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

机译:渐进载荷条件下制备锥度高度和边际设计对水泥琵琶应力的影响:三维有限元分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To assess the effect of preparation taper, height and margin design under different loading conditions on cement lute stress. A 3-D FE model of an upper second premolar and molar was developed from CT scan of human skull using software programmes (MIMICS, Hypermesh and ANSYS). 10° and 30° taper, 3 and 5 mm preparation height and shoulder and chamfer finish lines were used. Type 1 Glass ionomer cement with 24 μm lute width was taken and the model was loaded under 100 N horizontal point load, vertical point load distributed axial load. The maximum shear stress and Von Mises stress within the cement lute were recorded. The maximum shear stresses ranged from 1.70 to 3.93 MPa (horizontal point loading), 0.66 to 3.04 MPa (vertical point loading), 0.38 to 0.87 MPa (distributed loading). The maximum Von Mises stresses ranged from 3.39 to 10.62 MPa (horizontal point loading), 1.93 to 8.58 MPa (vertical point loading) and 1.49 to 3.57 MPa (distributed loading). The combination of 10° taper and 5 mm height had the lowest stress field while the combination of 30° taper and 5 mm height had the highest stress field. Distributed axial loading shows least stress, better stress homogenization and gives a favorable prognosis for the fixed prostheses. Smaller preparation taper of 10° is biomechanically more acceptable than a 30° taper. It is desirable to decrease taper as height increases. The chamfer margin design is associated with greater local cement stresses toward the margins that could place the cement at greater risk for microfracture and failure.
机译:为了评估在不同载荷条件下制备锥度,高度和余量设计对水泥琵琶应力的影响。使用软件程序(MIMICS,Hypermesh和ANSYS),通过人头颅骨的CT扫描,开发了上颌第二前磨牙和磨牙的3-D FE模型。锥度为10°和30°,制备高度为3和5 mm,并采用肩部和倒角精加工线。取胶体宽度为24μm的1型玻璃离聚物水泥,并将模型加载到100 N水平点载荷下,垂直点载荷分配轴向载荷。记录水泥琵琶内的最大剪切应力和冯·米塞斯应力。最大剪切应力范围为1.70至3.93 MPa(水平点载荷),0.66至3.04 MPa(垂直点载荷),0.38至0.87 MPa(分布载荷)。冯·米塞斯(Von Mises)的最大应力范围为3.39至10.62 MPa(水平点载荷),1.93至8.58 MPa(垂直点载荷)和1.49至3.57 MPa(分布载荷)。 10°锥度和5mm高的组合的应力场最低,而30°锥度和5mm高的组合的应力场最高。分布的轴向载荷显示出最小的应力,更好的应力均匀性,并为固定假体提供了良好的预后。从力学角度上讲,较小的10°准备锥度比30°锥度更可接受。期望随着高度的增加而减小锥度。倒角余量设计与朝向余量的更大的局部水泥应力相关,这可能会使水泥面临更大的微裂纹和破坏风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号