首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
【2h】

Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study

机译:对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌引起的导管相关性血流感染的癌症患者进行静脉至口服开关疗法的单中心回顾性观察研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The most common complication in cancer patients is catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), of which Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen. Although S. aureus CRBSI patients are recommended for prolonged intravenous therapy, this is often not feasible. We assessed the effectiveness of switching from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients with CRBSI due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). We conducted a retrospective observational study of 60 patients at one tertiary-care cancer center between April 2005 and March 2016. Patients who received effective intravenous (IV) antibiotics for at least 10 days (IV group) were compared to the IV group of patients who had switched to effective oral (PO) antibiotics after IV treatment for at least 10 days (IV + PO group). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 90 days. Univariate and propensity score-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses using variables likely to influence the outcomes were performed. Of the 60 patients, 32 (53.3%) and 28 (46.7%) were in the IV and IV + PO groups, respectively. The median antibiotic treatment durations in the IV and IV + PO groups were 17 (13–31) and 33 (26–52) days, respectively (p<0.001). The 90-day mortality in the IV and IV + PO groups were 53.1% (17/32) and 10.7% (3/28), respectively (p = 0.001). Univariate logistic regression model showed that the odds ratios of oral switch therapy for 90-day mortality was 0.106 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.027–0.423; p = 0.001). The propensity score-adjusted multivariate logistic regression model estimated the odds ratios of oral switched therapy for 90-day mortality as 0.377 (95% CI: 0.037–3.884; p = 0.413). Our results suggest that oral switch therapy was not associated with mortality in cancer patients with CRBSI due to MSSA compared with no oral switch therapy. Oral switch therapy may be a reasonable option for patients with CRBSI due to MSSA.
机译:癌症患者中最常见的并发症是导管相关的血流感染(CRBSI),其中金黄色葡萄球菌是常见的病原体。尽管建议对金黄色葡萄球菌CRBSI患者进行长时间的静脉内治疗,但这通常不可行。我们评估了对因甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)导致的CRBSI癌症患者从静脉内转为口服抗菌治疗的有效性。我们于2005年4月至2016年3月在一个三级癌症中心对60例患者进行了回顾性观察研究。将接受了有效静脉(IV)抗生素至少10天的患者(IV组)与进行静脉内(IV)治疗的患者进行了比较。在静脉注射治疗至少10天后(IV + PO组)已改用有效的口服(PO)抗生素。主要终点是90天内的全因死亡率。使用可能影响结果的变量进行单因素和倾向评分调整的多元逻辑回归分析。在60例患者中,分别在IV组和IV + PO组中分别占32位(53.3%)和28位(46.7%)。 IV和IV + PO组的中位抗生素治疗持续时间分别为17(13-31)天和33(26-52)天(p <0.001)。 IV和IV + PO组的90天死亡率分别为53.1%(17/32)和10.7%(3/28)(p = 0.001)。单因素逻辑回归模型显示,口服换药治疗90天死亡率的几率为0.106(95%置信区间[CI]:0.027-0.423; p = 0.001)。倾向得分调整的多元逻辑回归模型估计90天死亡率的口服交换疗法的比值比为0.377(95%CI:0.037-3.884; p = 0.413)。我们的研究结果表明,与不使用口服开关疗法相比,对于因MSSA而患有CRBSI的癌症患者,口服开关疗法与死亡率无关。由于MSSA,对于CRBSI患者,口服转换疗法可能是一种合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号