首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program 2012
【2h】

Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program 2012

机译:基于两种不同的诊断方案的自闭症谱系障碍监测状况的比较:亚特兰大都会发展障碍者监测计划的发现2012年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For the first time, the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported prevalence estimates based on two different diagnostic schemes in the 2014 surveillance period. Results found substantial agreement between surveillance case status based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fourth Edition–Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria and DSM-5 criteria ASD (kappa = 0.85). No study has replicated this agreement in another independent sample of surveillance records. The objectives of this study were to (1) replicate agreement between surveillance status based on DSM-IV-TR criteria and DSM-5 criteria for ASD, (2) quantify the number of children who met surveillance status based on only DSM-IV-TR criteria and only DSM-5 criteria for ASD, and (3) evaluate differences in characteristics of these latter two groups of children. The study sample was 8-year-old children who had health and education records reviewed for ASD surveillance in metropolitan Atlanta, GA in the 2012 surveillance year. Results found substantial agreement between child’s surveillance status using DSM-IV-TR criteria and DSM-5 criteria for ASD (kappa = 0.80). There were no differences in child race/ethnicity, child sex, or intellectual disability between surveillance status defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria and that defined by DSM-5 criteria. Children who met surveillance status based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, but not DSM-5 criteria, were more likely to have developmental concerns and evaluations in the first three years. Children who met surveillance status based on DSM-5 criteria, but not DSM-IV-TR criteria, were more likely to have been receiving autism-related services or previously diagnosed with ASD. These results suggest that surveillance status of ASD based on DSM-5 criteria is largely comparable to that based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, and identifies children with similar demographic and intellectual characteristics.
机译:疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的自闭症和发育障碍监测网络(ADDM)首次报告了在2014年监测期内基于两种不同诊断方案的患病率估计数。结果发现,根据《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》第四版–文本修订(DSM-IV-TR)标准与DSM-5标准ASD(kappa = 0.85),监视病例状态基本一致。尚无研究在另一个独立的监视记录样本中复制此协议。这项研究的目的是(1)在基于DSM-IV-TR标准的DSU-5标准和ASD的DSM-5标准之间复制监视状态,(2)仅基于DSM-IV- TR标准和仅适用于ASD的DSM-5标准,以及(3)评估了后两组儿童的特征差异。该研究样本是具有健康和教育记录的8岁儿童,他们在2012年监视年度对乔治亚州大城市亚特兰大进行了ASD监视。结果发现,使用DSM-IV-TR标准的儿童的监视状态与针对ASD的DSM-5的标准之间的基本一致(kappa = 0.80)。 DSM-IV-TR标准定义的监视状态与DSM-5标准定义的监视状态在儿童种族/民族,儿童性别或智力残疾方面没有差异。符合DSM-IV-TR标准(而非DSM-5标准)的监视状态的儿童在头三年中更有可能受到发展方面的关注和评估。符合DSM-5标准(而非DSM-IV-TR标准)达到监视状态的儿童,更有可能接受自闭症相关服务或先前被诊断患有ASD。这些结果表明,基于DSM-5标准的ASD监视状态与基于DSM-IV-TR标准的ASD监视状态在很大程度上可比,并且可以识别具有相似人口统计学和智力特征的儿童。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号