首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society >Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strengths of Different Core Materials with Various Luting Agents Used for Cast Crown Restorations
【2h】

Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strengths of Different Core Materials with Various Luting Agents Used for Cast Crown Restorations

机译:铸冠修复中使用不同浸润剂的不同芯材粘结强度的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The coronal cast restoration continues to be used commonly to restore mutilated, endodontically treated teeth. The tensile bond strength of luting cements is of critical importance as many of failures are at the core and the crown interface. An invitro study with aim to evaluate and compare bond strengths of luting cements between different core materials and cast crowns. A total of 45 extracted identical mandibular second premolars were endodontically treated and divided into 3 groups of 15 each. Specimens in first group were restored with cast post and core (Group C), and specimens in second group were restored with stainless steel parapost and composite core material (Group B) and specimens in third group were restored with stainless steel parapost and glass ionomer core build (Group G). Standardized crown preparation was done for all the specimens to receive cast crowns. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups and were cemented using 3 different luting cements namely, resin cement, polycarboxylate cement, glass ionomer cement (Type I). The samples of each subgroup (n = 5) were subjected to tensile testing using Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min till the dislodgement of crown from the core surface was observed. The bond strengths were significantly different according one way ANOVA (F-150.76 and p < 0.0000). The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with resin cement in cast core, composite core and glass ionomer core exhibited significantly higher bond strengths as compared to specimens cemented with glass ionomer and polycarboxylate cement. Composite resin core and resin cement combinations were superior to all other cement and core combinations tested.
机译:冠状石膏修复体通常继续用于修复残缺的,经牙髓治疗的牙齿。胶结水泥的拉伸粘结强度至关重要,因为许多破坏都发生在岩心和胎冠界面。一项旨在评估和比较不同型芯材料和铸冠之间的胶结水泥粘结强度的体外研究。牙髓治疗共提取45个相同的下颌第二前磨牙,分为3组,每组15个。第一组标本用铸件柱和芯(C组)修复,第二组标本用不锈钢伞柱和复合芯材料(B组)修复,第三组标本用不锈钢伞柱和玻璃离聚物芯修复。构建(G组)。对所有标本进行铸造冠的标准化冠准备。将每组进一步分为3个子组,并使用3种不同的胶接剂(树脂胶,聚羧酸盐胶,玻璃离聚物胶(I型))胶接。使用Universal Testing Machine以2mm / min的十字头速度对每个子组(n = 5)的样品进行拉伸测试,直到观察到冠冕从核心表面脱落为止。根据一种方法ANOVA(F-150.76和p <0.0000),粘结强度显着不同。研究结果表明,与玻璃离子交联聚合物和聚羧酸盐胶结的试样相比,在铸芯,复合芯和玻璃离聚物芯中用树脂胶结的试样具有更高的粘结强度。复合树脂芯和树脂胶合剂组合优于所有其他测试的水泥和芯组合物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号