首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Semantic Queries Expedite MedDRA Terms Selection Thanks to a Dedicated User Interface: A Pilot Study on Five Medical Conditions
【2h】

Semantic Queries Expedite MedDRA Terms Selection Thanks to a Dedicated User Interface: A Pilot Study on Five Medical Conditions

机译:专用的用户界面语义查询可加快MedDRA术语的选择:对五种医疗状况的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Searching into the MedDRA terminology is usually limited to a hierarchical search, and/or a string search. Our objective was to compare user performances when using a new kind of user interface enabling semantic queries versus classical methods, and evaluating term selection improvement in MedDRA.>Methods: We implemented a forms-based web interface: OntoADR Query Tools (OQT). It relies on OntoADR, a formal resource describing MedDRA terms using SNOMED CT concepts and corresponding semantic relations, enabling terminological reasoning. We then compared time spent on five examples of medical conditions using OQT or the MedDRA web-based browser (MWB), and precision and recall of the term selection.>Results: OntoADR Query Tools allows the user to search in MedDRA: One may enter search criteria by selecting one semantic property from a dropdown list and one or more SNOMED CT concepts related to the range of the chosen property. The user is assisted in building his query: he can add criteria and combine them. Then, the interface displays the set of MedDRA terms matching the query. Meanwhile, on average, the time spent on OQT (about 4 min 30 s) is significantly lower (−35%; p < 0.001) than time spent on MWB (about 7 min). The results of the System Usability Scale (SUS) gave a score of 62.19 for OQT (rated as good). We also demonstrated increased precision (+27%; p = 0.01) and recall (+34%; p = 0.02). Computed “performance” (correct terms found per minute) is more than three times better with OQT than with MWB.>Discussion: This pilot study establishes the feasibility of our approach based on our initial assumption: performing MedDRA queries on the five selected medical conditions, using terminological reasoning, expedites term selection, and improves search capabilities for pharmacovigilance end users. Evaluation with a larger number of users and medical conditions are required in order to establish if OQT is appropriate for the needs of different user profiles, and to check if conclusions can be extended to other kinds of medical conditions. The application is currently limited by the non-exhaustive coverage of MedDRA by OntoADR, but nevertheless shows good performance which encourages continuing in the same direction.
机译:>背景:搜索MedDRA术语通常仅限于分层搜索和/或字符串搜索。我们的目标是比较使用新型用户界面和语义方法与传统方法时的用户性能,并评估MedDRA中术语选择的改进。>方法:我们实现了基于表单的Web界面:OntoADR查询工具(OQT)。它依赖于OntoADR,后者是使用SNOMED CT概念和相应语义关系描述MedDRA术语的正式资源,支持术语推理。然后,我们比较了使用OQT或MedDRA基于Web的浏览器(MWB)在五个医疗状况示例上花费的时间,以及术语选择的精确度和召回率。>结果:OntoADR查询工具允许用户搜索在MedDRA中:通过从下拉列表中选择一种语义属性以及与所选属性范围有关的一个或多个SNOMED CT概念,可以输入搜索条件。帮助用户建立他的查询:他可以添加条件并将其组合。然后,界面显示与查询匹配的MedDRA术语集。同时,平均而言,花费在OQT上的时间(约4分钟30 s)明显低于花费在MWB上的​​时间(约7分钟)(-35%; p <0.001)。系统可用性量表(SUS)的OQT得分为62.19(被评为良好)。我们还证明了提高的准确性(+ 27%; p = 0.01)和召回率(+ 34%; p = 0.02)。与OWB相比,OQT的计算出的“性能”(每分钟找到正确的术语)要比MWB好三倍。>讨论:该初步研究基于我们最初的假设确定了我们方法的可行性:执行MedDRA查询在五个选定的医疗条件下,使用术语推理来加快术语选择的速度,并提高对药物警戒性最终用户的搜索能力。为了确定OQT是否适合不同用户概况的需要,并检查结论是否可以扩展到其他种类的医疗状况,需要进行大量用户和医疗状况的评估。目前,该应用受到OntoADR对MedDRA的非详尽报道的限制,但是仍然显示出良好的性能,鼓励继续朝同一方向发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号