首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society >A Comparative Evaluation of Temperature Changes in the Pulpal Chamber during Direct Fabrication of Provisional Restorations: An In Vitro Study
【2h】

A Comparative Evaluation of Temperature Changes in the Pulpal Chamber during Direct Fabrication of Provisional Restorations: An In Vitro Study

机译:直接制作临时修复体过程中P室内温度变化的比较评估:一项体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the temperature changes in the pulpal chamber during fabrication of provisional restorations by direct method. A total of 108 three-unit FPD provisional restorations were fabricated on a study model and divided into three main groups according to the material used for the fabrication of matrix. Group A—Alginate impression index group, Group B—Polyvinylsiloxane putty impression index group, Group C—Vacuum formed template group. Each group comprising of 36 specimens, was subdivided into three subgroups based on the provisional restorative material used: polymethylmethacrylate (subgroup 1), polyethylmethacrylate (subgroup 2), bis-acryl composite resin (subgroup 3). Intrapulpal temperature changes were observed with the help of a thermocouple probe (connected to a digital microprocessor thermometer) inserted into the pulp chamber of an extracted mandibular second molar mounted on a study model, during the fabrication of provisional restorations by direct method. The subgroups mean temperature rise observed in Group A—A1, A2, A3 was 2.6250 ± 0.2491, 1.0500 ± 0.1382, 0.4083 ± 0.1165, respectively. The subgroups mean temperature rise observed in Group B—B1, B2, B3 was 4.6250 ± 0.2454, 3.3750 ± 0.3415, 2.5917 ± 0.2678, respectively. The subgroups mean temperature rise observed in Group C—C1, C2, C3 was 4.7694 ± 1.8361, 3.0611 ± 1.5767, 2.3806 ± 1.5713, respectively. The observations were statistically significant. The intrapulpal temperature rise during fabrication of a provisional restoration depended both on the type of provisional restorative material and the type of matrix used. The clinician should choose carefully the resin and the matrix material while fabricating provisional restorations with direct method.
机译:通过直接方法比较在临时修复体制造过程中牙髓腔内的温度变化。在研究模型上总共制造了108个三单元FPD临时修复体,根据用于制造基质的材料分为三大类。组A为藻酸盐印象指数组,组B为聚乙烯基硅氧烷腻子印象指数组,组C为真空成型模板组。根据所用的临时修复材料,每组包括36个样品,分为三个子组:聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(子组1),聚甲基丙烯酸乙酯(子组2),双丙烯酸复合树脂(子组3)。在通过直接方法制造临时修复体的过程中,借助插入安装在研究模型上的下颌第二磨牙的牙髓腔中的热电偶探针(连接至数字微处理器温度计),观察了足内温度的变化。亚组A1,A2,A3中观察到的平均温度升高分别为2.6250±0.2491、1.0500±0.1382、0.4083±0.1165。在B1,B2,B3组中观察到的亚组平均温度升高分别为4.6250±0.2454、3.3750±0.3415、2.5917±0.2678。在C1,C2,C3组中观察到的亚组平均温度升高分别为4.7694±1.8361、3.0611±1.5767、2.3806±1.5713。观察结果具有统计学意义。在临时修复体的制造过程中,颅内温度的升高取决于临时修复材料的类型和所用基质的类型。临床医生在用直接方法制作临时修复体时,应仔细选择树脂和基质材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号