首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supremeTM as non-inflatable cuff device and self-pressurized air-QTM in children
【2h】

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supremeTM as non-inflatable cuff device and self-pressurized air-QTM in children

机译:儿童喉罩式气道supremeTM不可充气袖带装置和自加压air-QTM的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Supraglottic airway (SGA) device with non-inflatable cuff reduce the airway complications associated with cuff hyperinflation. The aim of the study is to determine whether the default setting of Supreme is as effective as the non-inflatable cuff devices. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured and compared between the Supreme and Air-Q, a typical non-inflatable cuff device. We hypothesized that the default setting of Supreme is non-inferior to the the Air-Q self-pressurized (SP) in respect to the oropharyngeal leak pressure.
机译:背景:具有非充气式袖带的声门上气道(SGA)装置可减少与袖带过度充气相关的气道并发症。该研究的目的是确定Supreme的默认设置是否与非充气袖带设备一样有效。测量口咽泄漏压力,并在Supreme和典型的非充气式袖带设备Air-Q之间进行比较。我们假设就口咽泄漏压力而言,Supreme的默认设置不逊于Air-Q自加压(SP)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号