首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Empiric Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Massive or Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Ten-year Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Center
【2h】

Empiric Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Massive or Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Ten-year Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Center

机译:大型或复发性胃肠道出血的经导管介入动脉栓塞术:从一家三级护理中心获得的十年经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeIn patients with massive or recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) which is not amenable to endoscopic therapy, angiographic interventions are often employed. We report our ten-year experience of empiric transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for patients with massive or recurrent GIB.MethodsAll patients who had undergone empiric TAE at our hospital between March 2004 and June 2015 were identified using the institutional radiology information system. A retrospective chart review was performed using a structured pro forma. Technical success rate, 30-day clinical success rate, 30-day mortality rate, and rate of procedural complications were computed. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.ResultsA total of 32 patients had undergone empiric TAE for GIB during the study period. The median age of subjects was 56 years and two-thirds of them were male (68.7%). Gastroduodenal (n=24), ileocolic (n=3), left gastric (n=2), right gastroepiploic (n=1), and branches of superior and middle rectal arteries (n=1) were embolized using microcoils (n=25), polyvinyl alcohol particles (n=25), and gelatin sponge (n=3)--either alone or in combination. Technical and 30-day clinical success rates were 96.9% (31/32) and 71.9% (23/32), respectively. The 30-day mortality rate for our cohort was 21.9% (7/32). One patient developed re-bleeding at two days after the initial procedure and required repeat embolization. Coil migration (n=3) and access site hematoma (n=1) were the observed procedural complications.ConclusionEmpiric TAE can be a useful treatment option for selected patients with massive or recurrent GIB that is not amenable to endoscopic therapy.
机译:目的对于不适合内镜治疗的大量或复发性胃肠道出血(GIB)患者,通常采用血管造影术。我们报告了我们对大型或复发性GIB患者进行经验性经导管动脉栓塞(TAE)的十年经验。方法2004年3月至2015年6月间在我院接受了经验性TAE的所有患者均使用机构放射学信息系统进行鉴定。使用结构化备考进行回顾性图表审查。计算技术成功率,30天临床成功率,30天死亡率和手术并发症发生率。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本20进行统计分析。结果在研究期间,共有32例患者接受了GIB的经验性TAE。受试者的中位年龄为56岁,其中三分之二是男性(68.7%)。胃十二指肠(n = 24),回肠(n = 3),左胃(n = 2),右胃上肌(n = 1)和直肠上和中动脉的分支(n = 1)用微线圈栓塞(n = 25),聚乙烯醇颗粒(n = 25)和明胶海绵(n = 3)-单独或组合使用。技术和30天临床成功率分别为96.9%(31/32)和71.9%(23/32)。我们队列的30天死亡率为21.9%(7/32)。一名患者在初始手术后两天出现再出血,需要再次栓塞。线圈移位(n = 3)和进入部位血肿(n = 1)是所观察到的程序并发症。结论经验性TAE可以作为某些不适合内镜治疗的大量或复发性GIB患者的有用治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号