首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Strain-level diversity of commercial probiotic isolates of Bacillus Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces species illustrated by molecular identification and phenotypic profiling
【2h】

Strain-level diversity of commercial probiotic isolates of Bacillus Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces species illustrated by molecular identification and phenotypic profiling

机译:分子鉴定和表型分析说明了芽孢杆菌乳酸杆菌和酿酒酵母物种商业益生菌分离株的菌株水平多样性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Probiotic products are becoming more prevalent as awareness of the role of beneficial microbes in health increases. Ingredient labels of these products often omit identifications at the strain level, making it difficult to track down applicable published research. In this study, we investigated whether products labeled with the same species name contained different strains of those species. From 21 commercially available probiotic supplements and beverages, we cultured five main species: Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and the yeast Saccharomyces boulardii. To confirm the identity of each bacterial isolate, we applied standard molecular approaches: 16S rRNA gene sequencing and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Phenotypic profiling and identification were performed with the Biolog Microbial Identification system. All of the bacterial isolates were correctly identified by at least one approach. Sequencing the 16S rRNA gene led to 82% of species identifications matching the product label, with 71% of isolates identified by MALDI-TOF MS and 60% identified correctly with the Biolog system. Analysis of the Biolog phenotypic profiles revealed different patterns of carbon source usage by each species, with sugars preferentially utilized by all except B. subtilis. To assess the strain-level differences, we compared strains of the same species and found variability in carbohydrate utilization and tolerance to environmental stressors (salt, acidity, antibiotics). By demonstrating that products listing the same species often contain strains with different 16S sequences and phenotypes, this study highlights that current labels of probiotic supplements do not sufficiently convey the strain diversity in these products.
机译:随着人们越来越了解有益微生物在健康中的作用,益生菌产品变得越来越普遍。这些产品的成分标签通常会省略菌株级别的标识,因此很难追踪适用的已发表研究。在这项研究中,我们调查了标有相同物种名称的产品是否包含这些物种的不同菌株。从21种市售的益生菌补充剂和饮料中,我们培养了5个主要种类:凝结芽孢杆菌,枯草芽孢杆菌,植物乳杆菌,鼠李糖乳杆菌和酵母酵母(Saccharomyces boulardii)。为了确认每个细菌分离物的身份,我们应用了标准的分子方法:16S rRNA基因测序和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)。用Biolog微生物鉴定系统进行表型分析和鉴定。所有细菌分离物均通过至少一种方法正确鉴定。对16S rRNA基因进行测序导致82%的物种鉴定与产品标签相符,其中MALDI-TOF MS鉴定出71%的分离物,而Biolog系统鉴定出60%的正确。对Biolog表型图谱的分析显示,每种物种的碳源使用方式不同,除枯草芽孢杆菌外,所有物种均优先利用糖。为了评估菌株水平的差异,我们比较了相同物种的菌株,发现碳水化合物利用的变异性和对环境胁迫因素(盐,酸度,抗生素)的耐受性。通过证明列出同一物种的产品通常包含具有不同16S序列和表型的菌株,该研究强调了目前益生菌补品的标签不能充分传达这些产品中的菌株多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号