首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Headache and Pain >The burden of headache in China: validation of diagnostic questionnaire for a population-based survey
【2h】

The burden of headache in China: validation of diagnostic questionnaire for a population-based survey

机译:中国头痛的重担:基于人口调查的诊断问卷的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to test the validity, in the Chinese population, of the Lifting The Burden diagnostic questionnaire for the purpose of a population-based survey of the burden of headache in China. From all regions of China, a population-based sample of 417 respondents had completed the structured questionnaire in a door-to-door survey conducted by neurologists from local hospitals calling unannounced. They were contacted for re-interview by telephone by headache specialists who were unaware of the questionnaire diagnoses. A screening question ascertained whether headache had occurred in the last year. If they had, the specialists applied their expertise and ICHD-II diagnostic criteria to make independent diagnoses which, as the gold standard, were later compared with the questionnaire diagnoses. There were 18 refusals; 399 interviews were conducted in 202 women and 197 men aged 18–65 years (mean age 44.4 ± 12.6 years). In comparison to the specialists’ diagnoses, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Cohen’s kappa (95% CI) of the questionnaire for the diagnosis of migraine were 0.83, 0.99, 0.83, 0.99 and 0.82 (0.71–0.93), respectively; for the diagnosis of tension-type headache (TTH), they were 0.51, 0.99, 0.86, 0.92 and 0.59 (0.46–0.72), respectively. In conclusion, the questionnaire was accurate and reliable in diagnosing migraine (agreement level excellent), less so, but adequate, for TTH (sensitivity relatively low, false negative rate relatively high and agreement level fair to good). The non-specific features of TTH do not lend themselves well to diagnosis by questionnaire.
机译:这项研究的目的是测试“解除负担”诊断问卷在中国人群中的有效性,以进行基于人群的中国头痛负担调查。来自中国所有地区的417名受访者进行了基于人口的抽样调查,这些调查问卷是由当地医院的神经科医生进行的逐户调查完成的,调查内容未经通知。头疼的专家不知情问卷调查,通过电话联系他们进行重新访谈。筛选问题确定了去年是否发生过头痛。如果有的话,专家们将运用他们的专业知识和ICHD-II诊断标准进行独立诊断,并将其作为黄金标准,随后与问卷诊断进行比较。有18次拒绝;在202位女性和197位男性中进行了399次采访,年龄在18-65岁之间(平均年龄44.4±12.6岁)。与专家的诊断相比,偏头痛诊断问卷的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和科恩卡帕(95%CI)为0.83、0.99、0.83、0.99和0.82(0.71-0.93 ), 分别;用于诊断紧张型头痛(TTH)的分别为0.51、0.99、0.86、0.92和0.59(0.46-0.72)。总之,该问卷对于偏头痛的诊断是准确而可靠的(协议水平极好),但对TTH的诊断则较差,但足够(敏感性相对较低,假阴性率相对较高,协议水平相当良好)。 TTH的非特异性特征不适合通过问卷进行诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号