首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Headache and Pain >Why do GPs with a special interest in headache investigate headache presentations with neuroradiology and what do they find?
【2h】

Why do GPs with a special interest in headache investigate headache presentations with neuroradiology and what do they find?

机译:为什么对头痛特别感兴趣的全科医生会通过神经放射学调查头痛表现他们发现了什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The general practitioner with a special interest in headache offers an important contribution to the management of headache in primary care where the majority of presentations take place. A number of guidelines have been developed for neuroradiological investigation of headache, but their clinical utility and relevance is not known. Fourteen general practitioners with a special interest in headache recorded consecutive headache consultations over a 3-month period, whether patients were investigated with neuroradiology and if so the reason for investigation and outcome. Reason for investigation was compared to the guidelines published for the use in primary care. 895 patients were seen, of whom 270 (30.1%) were investigated. 47% of indications were outside the guidance framework used, the most common reason for investigation being reassurance. Of those investigated, 5.6% showed positive findings but only 1.9% of findings were felt to be of clinical significance. General practitioners with a special interest investigated with neuroradiology a greater level than general practitioners, but less than neurologists. However, yields of significant findings are broadly comparative across all groups. This report confirms other studies that suggest that even when there is a high level of clinical suspicion, yields of significant findings are very low.
机译:对头痛特别感兴趣的全科医生为大部分就诊的初级保健中头痛的治疗做出了重要贡献。已经为头痛的神经放射学研究开发了许多指南,但是它们的临床用途和相关性尚不清楚。 14位对头痛特别感兴趣的全科医生在3个月的时间内进行了连续的头痛咨询,是否对患者进行了神经放射学检查,如果是,则进行调查的原因和结果。将调查原因与已发布的用于初级保健的指南进行了比较。观察到895位患者,其中270位(30.1%)被调查。 47%的适应症不在所使用的指导框架范围内,最常见的调查原因是放心。在接受调查的患者中,有5.6%的患者表现出阳性结果,但只有1.9%的患者被认为具有临床意义。具有特殊兴趣的全科医生对神经放射学的调查水平高于全科医生,但少于神经科医师。但是,在所有组中,重要发现的收益率具有广泛的可比性。该报告证实了其他研究,这些研究表明,即使临床上怀疑程度很高,重要发现的产率也很低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号