首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmaceutics >Size Distribution of Colistin Delivery by Different Type Nebulizers and Concentrations During Mechanical Ventilation
【2h】

Size Distribution of Colistin Delivery by Different Type Nebulizers and Concentrations During Mechanical Ventilation

机译:机械通气过程中不同类型雾化器输送的共利斯汀的尺寸分布和浓度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although aerosol delivery through mechanical ventilators has been used to administer various medications, little is known of administration with colistin. This in vitro evaluation aimed to evaluate size distribution of colistin delivery by different types of nebulizers and concentrations during mechanical ventilation. Colistin methanesulfonate (colistin) for injection was dissolved in 6 mL of distilled water to produce a low concentration (L; 156 mg) and a high concentration (H; 312 mg). A dose volume of 6 mL was placed in a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) and a jet nebulizer (JN). The inhaled mass (mean ± SD) of the VMN-L (53.80 ± 14.79 mg) was greater than both the JN-L (19.82 ± 3.34 mg, P = 0.001) and JN-H (31.72 ± 4.48 mg, P = 0.017). The nebulization time of the VMN-L (42.35 ± 2.30 min) was two times longer than the JN-L (21.12 ± 0.8 min) or JN-H (21.65 ± 0.42 min; P < 0.001). The mass median aerodynamic distal to the endotracheal tube was within a similar range at 2.03 to 2.26 μm (P = 0.434), independent of neb or formulation concentration. In conclusion, the VMN-L yields greater inhaled mass than the JN with either concentration. Therefore, a standard nominal dose of colistin results in a higher delivered dose during mechanical ventilation with a VMN compared with a JN and may be considered the preferred device. If JN must be used, multiple doses of low concentration colistin may compensate for poor delivery performance.
机译:尽管通过机械呼吸机进行气雾剂输送已被用于各种药物的给药,但对粘菌素的给药知之甚少。这项体外评估旨在评估机械通气过程中通过不同类型的雾化器输送的粘菌素的尺寸分布和浓度。将注射用的共利斯汀甲磺酸盐(colistin)溶于6 mL蒸馏水中,以产生低浓度(L; 156 mg)和高浓度(H; 312 mg)。将剂量为6 mL的剂量置于振动筛网雾化器(VMN)和喷射雾化器(JN)中。 VMN-L(53.80±14.79 mg)的吸入质量(平均值±SD)大于JN-L(19.82±3.34 mg,P = 0.001)和JN-H(31.72±4.48 mg,P = 0.017) )。 VMN-L的雾化时间(42.35±2.30分钟)是JN-L(21.12±0.8分钟)或JN-H(21.65±0.42分钟; P <0.001)的两倍。气管插管远端的中位空气动力学在2.03至2.26μm(P = 0.434)的相似范围内,与笔尖或制剂浓度无关。总之,在任一浓度下,VMN-L的吸入质量均比JN大。因此,与JN相比,在使用VMN进行机械通气时,大肠粘菌素的标准标称剂量会导致较高的输送剂量,因此可以认为是首选设备。如果必须使用JN,则多剂量的低浓度粘菌素可能会弥补较差的输送性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号