首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Differential diagnosis of sensory modulation disorder (SMD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): participation sensation and attention
【2h】

Differential diagnosis of sensory modulation disorder (SMD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): participation sensation and attention

机译:鉴别诊断感觉调节障碍(SMD)和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD):参与感觉和注意

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Differential diagnosis between sensory modulation disorder (SMD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often challenging, since these disorders occur at a high rate of co-morbidity and share several clinical characteristics. Preliminary studies providing evidence that these are distinct disorders have focused solely on body functions, using sophisticated laboratory measurements. Moreover, no studies have compared participation profiles of these populations. This study is the first to compare the profiles of these populations regarding both “body functions” (attention and sensation) and “participation,” using measures applicable for clinical use. The study included 19 children with ADHD without SMD and 19 with SMD without ADHD (diagnosed by both pediatric neurologists and occupational therapists), aged 6–9, and matched by age and gender. All children underwent a broad battery of evaluations: the Evaluation of Sensory Processing, Fabric Prickliness Test (FPT) and Von Frey Test to evaluate sensory processing, and Test of Everyday Attention to evaluate attention components. The Participation in Childhood Occupations Questionnaire was used to evaluate participation. Results support significant group differences in all sensory components, including pain intensity to suprathreshold stimuli and pain “after sensation,” as well as in tactile, vestibular, taste, and olfactory processing. No differences were found in attention components and participation. This study has both theoretical and clinical importance, inter alia, providing further evidence of two distinct disorders as well as indications of specific clinical instruments that might enable clinicians to implement differential diagnoses. In addition, results accord with other previous statements, which indicate that the clinical diagnosis of children with disabilities may not be a major factor in determining their participation profile.
机译:感觉调节障碍(SMD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)之间的区别诊断通常具有挑战性,因为这些疾病的合并症发病率很高,并且具有几种临床特征。初步研究提供了证据,表明这些是独特的疾病,它们使用复杂的实验室测量结果仅关注身体功能。此外,尚无研究比较这些人群的参与情况。这项研究是首次使用适用于临床的措施,比较了这些人群在“身体功能”(注意力和感觉)和“参与”方面的概况。该研究包括19例无SMD的ADHD儿童和19例无ADHD的SMD儿童(由儿科神经科医生和职业治疗师诊断),年龄6-9岁,并按年龄和性别进行匹配。所有儿童均接受了广泛的评估:感官加工评估,织物点刺度测试(FPT)和冯·弗雷测试以评估感官加工,以及“日常注意力测试”以评估注意力成分。参与儿童职业调查表用于评估参与度。结果支持所有感觉成分的显着组差异,包括上阈刺激的疼痛强度和“感觉”后的疼痛,以及触觉,前庭,味觉和嗅觉处理。在注意力组成和参与度上均未发现差异。这项研究具有重要的理论和临床意义,尤其是可以提供两种不同疾病的进一步证据,以及可以使临床医生进行鉴别诊断的特定临床工具的指征。此外,结果与之前的其他陈述相符,这些陈述表明,对残疾儿童的临床诊断可能不是决定其参与状况的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号