首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Comparative Study of TCM Syndrome Scale for Liver Disease and Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire Based on Assessment of Posthepatitic Cirrhosis
【2h】

Comparative Study of TCM Syndrome Scale for Liver Disease and Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire Based on Assessment of Posthepatitic Cirrhosis

机译:肝炎后肝硬化中医证候量表与慢性肝病问卷的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. To compare and analyze the relevance and applied value of chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) and Traditional Chinese Medicine liver disease questionnaire (TCMLDQ) in patients with posthepatitic cirrhosis. Methods. The data of 146 patients' scales of CLDQ and TCMLDQ which based on the characteristics of chinese medical symptoms were collected. We made comparative analysis of the relationship between these two scales by the linear regression model and canonical correlation method and evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of two scales about its items setting and dimension definition. Result. There is a negative correlation in total scores between the two scales and the linear regression equation: CLDQ = 239.38 − 1.232TCMLDQ. The further canonical correlation analysis was used to analyze the two extracted canonical correlative variables with significances (P < 0.05), and the results showed that the overall negative correlation between the two scales mainly came from contributions of both the four dimensions of TCMLDQ (CS, GSYX, GYPX, and OS) and the five dimensions of CLDQ (AS, FA, SS, AC, and EF). Conclusion. These two scales have good consistency in the evaluation of severity and life quality of liver cirrhosis patients, so we suggested that TCMLDQ can be used to evaluate the severity and life quality of patients with posthepatitic cirrhosis.
机译:目的。比较和分析慢性肝病问卷(CLDQ)和中医肝病问卷(TCMLDQ)在肝炎后肝硬化患者中的相关性和应用价值。方法。根据中医症状特点,收集146例CLDQ和TCLMDQ患者量表。我们通过线性回归模型和典型相关方法对这两个量表之间的关系进行了比较分析,并评估了两个量表在项目设置和维度定义上的优缺点。结果。两种量表与线性回归方程之间的总分呈负相关:CLDQ = 239.38 − 1.232TCMLDQ。进一步的典型相关分析用于分析两个具有显着性的典型相关变量(P <0.05),结果表明,两个量表之间的总体负相关性主要来自TCLMDQ(CS, GSYX,GYPX和OS)以及CLDQ的五个维度(AS,FA,SS,AC和EF)。结论。这两个量表在评估肝硬化患者的严重程度和生活质量方面具有良好的一致性,因此我们建议TCMLDQ可用于评估肝炎后肝硬化患者的严重程度和生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号