首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous Brain-Computer Interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design
【2h】

Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous Brain-Computer Interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design

机译:当前人类自发性脑机接口训练规程中的缺陷:从教学设计中学到的教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While recent research on Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) has highlighted their potential for many applications, they remain barely used outside laboratories. The main reason is their lack of robustness. Indeed, with current BCI, mental state recognition is usually slow and often incorrect. Spontaneous BCI (i.e., mental imagery-based BCI) often rely on mutual learning efforts by the user and the machine, with BCI users learning to produce stable ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG) patterns (spontaneous BCI control being widely acknowledged as a skill) while the computer learns to automatically recognize these EEG patterns, using signal processing. Most research so far was focused on signal processing, mostly neglecting the human in the loop. However, how well the user masters the BCI skill is also a key element explaining BCI robustness. Indeed, if the user is not able to produce stable and distinct EEG patterns, then no signal processing algorithm would be able to recognize them. Unfortunately, despite the importance of BCI training protocols, they have been scarcely studied so far, and used mostly unchanged for years. In this paper, we advocate that current human training approaches for spontaneous BCI are most likely inappropriate. We notably study instructional design literature in order to identify the key requirements and guidelines for a successful training procedure that promotes a good and efficient skill learning. This literature study highlights that current spontaneous BCI user training procedures satisfy very few of these requirements and hence are likely to be suboptimal. We therefore identify the flaws in BCI training protocols according to instructional design principles, at several levels: in the instructions provided to the user, in the tasks he/she has to perform, and in the feedback provided. For each level, we propose new research directions that are theoretically expected to address some of these flaws and to help users learn the BCI skill more efficiently.
机译:尽管最近对脑机接口(BCI)的研究强调了其在许多应用中的潜力,但它们仍很少在实验室外使用。主要原因是它们缺乏鲁棒性。确实,在当前的BCI中,精神状态识别通常很慢,而且常常不正确。自发性BCI(即基于心理影像的BCI)通常依赖于用户和机器之间的相互学习努力,其中BCI用户学习在计算机上产生稳定的脑电图(EEG)模式(自发性BCI控制被广泛认为是一项技能)。学会使用信号处理自动识别这些EEG模式。到目前为止,大多数研究都集中在信号处理上,而大多数人忽略了循环中的人。但是,用户对BCI技能的掌握程度也是解释BCI健壮性的关键因素。的确,如果用户无法产生稳定而独特的EEG模式,则没有信号处理算法将无法识别它们。不幸的是,尽管BCI培训协议很重要,但迄今为止,对其进行了很少的研究,并且多年来一直保持不变。在本文中,我们主张当前针对自然BCI的人类训练方法很可能是不合适的。我们特别研究教学设计文献,以便确定成功的培训过程的关键要求和准则,以促进良好而有效的技能学习。该文献研究突出表明,当前的自发BCI用户培训程序几乎不能满足这些要求,因此可能不理想。因此,我们根据教学设计原则从多个级别确定BCI培训协议中的缺陷:在提供给用户的说明中,在他/她必须执行的任务中以及在提供的反馈中。对于每个级别,我们都提出了新的研究方向,从理论上讲,这些新的研究方向将解决这些缺陷并帮助用户更有效地学习BCI技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号