首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of International Advanced Otology >Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users
【2h】

Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users

机译:儿科人工耳蜗用户中传统和新型诱发复合动作电位记录方法与诱发听性脑干反应的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVESElectrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) recordings are widely used in functional evaluation and fitting of cochlear implants (CI) in clinics. We compared the results from two eCAP recording approaches (StandardART and FineGrain, MED-EL, Austria). The FineGrain method is more advanced than the Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (StandardART) method in terms of the stimulation and algorithm for the eCAP threshold detection. To understand the benefits of these alterations, we compared the two methods on a larger scale in pediatric CI users alongside evoked auditory brainstem responses (eABR).
机译:目的电诱发的复合动作电位(eCAP)记录被广泛用于临床中耳蜗植入物(CI)的功能评估和装配。我们比较了两种eCAP记录方法(StandardART和FineGrain,MED-EL,奥地利)的结果。在刺激和eCAP阈值检测算法方面,FineGrain方法比听觉神经响应遥测(StandardART)方法更先进。为了了解这些改变的好处,我们在儿童CI使用者以及诱发性听觉脑干反应(eABR)中比较了两种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号