首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Quality of coverage: Conformity measures for stereotactic radiosurgery
【2h】

Quality of coverage: Conformity measures for stereotactic radiosurgery

机译:覆盖质量:立体定向放射外科的合格评定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In radiosurgery, conformity indices are often used to compare competing plans, evaluate treatment techniques, and assess clinical complications. Several different indices have been reported to measure the conformity of the prescription isodose to the target volume. The PITV recommended in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiosurgery guidelines, defined as the ratio of the prescription isodose volume (PI) over the target volume (TV), is probably the most frequently quoted. However, these currently used conformity indices depend on target size and shape complexity. The objectives of this study are to systematically investigate the influence of target size and shape complexity on existing conformity indices, and to propose a different conformity index–the conformity distance index (CDI). The CDI is defined as the average distance between the target and the prescription isodose line. This study examines five case groups with volumes of 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, and 30.0 cm3. Each case group includes four simulated shapes: a sphere, a moderate ellipsoid, an extreme ellipsoid, and a concave “C” shape. Prescription dose coverages are generated for three simplified clinical scenarios, i.e., the PI completely covers the TV with 1 and 2 mm margins, and the PI over‐covers one half of the TV with a 1 mm margin and under‐covers the other half with a 1 mm margin. Existing conformity indices and the CDI are calculated for these five case groups as well as seven clinical cases. When these values are compared, the RTOG PITV conformity index and other similar conformity measures have much higher values than the CDI for smaller and more complex shapes. With the same quality of prescription dose coverage, the CDI yields a consistent conformity measure. For the seven clinical cases, we also find that the same PITV values can be associated with very different conformity qualities while the CDI predicts the conformity quality accurately. In summary, the proposed CDI provides more consistent and accurate conformity measurements for all target sizes and shapes studied, and therefore will be a more useful conformity index for irregularly shaped targets.PACS number(s): 87.90.+y, 87.53.Ly
机译:在放射外科中,合格指数通常用于比较竞争计划,评估治疗技术和评估临床并发症。据报道,有几种不同的指标可用来测量等剂量处方药与目标剂量的符合性。放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)放射外科手术指南中推荐的PITV可能是最常被引用的,定义为处方等剂量体积(PI)与目标体积(TV)的比率。但是,这些当前使用的一致性指标取决于目标尺寸和形状复杂性。这项研究的目的是系统地研究目标尺寸和形状复杂度对现有合格指标的影响,并提出一种不同的合格指标-合格距离指数(CDI)。 CDI定义为目标与处方等剂量线之间的平均距离。这项研究调查了五个病例组,分别为0.3、1.0、3.0、10.0和30.0 cm 3 。每个案例组包括四个模拟的形状:一个球体,一个中等的椭圆体,一个极端的椭圆体和一个凹入的“ C”形。处方剂量覆盖范围是针对三种简化的临床情况生成的,即PI完全覆盖了1毫米和2毫米边缘的电视,PI覆盖了电视的一半,边缘为1毫米,而另一半则覆盖了一半。 1毫米的边距。计算这五个病例组以及七个临床病例的现有合格指数和CDI。比较这些值时,对于更小,更复杂的形状,RTOG PITV合格指数和其他类似的合格度量值比CDI高得多。在相同质量的处方剂量覆盖范围内,CDI可以产生一致的合格评定。对于这七个临床案例,我们还发现相同的PITV值可以与非常不同的合格质量相关联,而CDI可以准确地预测合格质量。综上所述,拟议的CDI可为研究的所有目标尺寸和形状提供更一致,更准确的一致性测量,因此对于不规则形状的目标将是更有用的一致性指标.PACS编号:87.90。+ y,87.53。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号