首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Accuracy of rapid radiographic film calibration for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy verification
【2h】

Accuracy of rapid radiographic film calibration for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy verification

机译:快速射线照相胶片校准用于强度调制放射疗法验证的准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A single calibration film method was evaluated for use with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy film quality assurance measurements. The single‐film method has the potential advantages of exposure simplicity, less media consumption, and improved processor quality control. Potential disadvantages include cross contamination of film exposure, implementation effort to document delivered dose, and added complication of film response analysis. Film response differences were measured between standard and single‐film calibration methods. Additional measurements were performed to help trace causes for the observed discrepancies. Kodak X‐OmatV (XV) film was found to have greater response variability than extended dose range (EDR) film. We found it advisable for XV film to relate the film response calibration for the single‐film method to a user‐defined optimal calibration geometry. Using a single calibration film exposed at the time of experiment, the total uncertainty of film response was estimated to be   2% (1%) for XV (EDR) film at 50 (100) cGy and higher, respectively.PACS numbers: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Dq
机译:评估了单一校准膜方法与强度调制放射疗法膜质量保证测量一起使用的方法。单膜方法具有潜在的优势,即曝光简单,介质消耗少,处理器质量控制得到改善。潜在的缺点包括胶片曝光的交叉污染,记录交付剂量的实施工作以及胶片响应分析的复杂性。在标准和单膜校准方法之间测量了膜响应差异。进行了其他测量以帮助跟踪观察到的差异的原因。发现柯达X-OmatV(XV)胶片比扩展剂量范围(EDR)胶片具有更大的响应可变性。我们发现,对于XV胶片,建议将单胶片方法的胶片响应校准与用户定义的最佳校准几何形状相关联。使用在实验时暴露的单张校准膜,对于XV(EDR)膜在50(100)cGy或更高的温度下,膜响应的总不确定度估计为<2%(1%)。PACS数:87.53 .j,87.53.Dq

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号