首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses >Cross‐neutralisation of antibodies elicited by an inactivated split‐virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine in healthy adults against H5N1 clade 2 strains
【2h】

Cross‐neutralisation of antibodies elicited by an inactivated split‐virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine in healthy adults against H5N1 clade 2 strains

机译:灭活的甲型病毒越南/越南/ 1194/2004(H5N1)疫苗灭活的健康成年人针对H5N1进化枝2株疫苗引起的抗体的交叉中和

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background  Highly pathogenic avian influenza A H5N1 viruses are widespread in different parts of the world and have evolved into clade 1 and 2 lineages. Their continuing circulation represents serious pandemic threat, spurring human vaccine development efforts. Initial clinical trials tested vaccines prepared from clade 1 strains circulating in 2004. >Methods  Post‐vaccination sera from a phase I trial of an inactivated split‐virion vaccine based on A/Vietnam/1194/2004/NIBRG14 (H5N1) were analysed in vitro for cross‐reactivity against highly pathogenic, wild‐type clade 2 H5N1 strains isolated from human cases, and their corresponding reverse genetics derived vaccine candidate strains. >Results  Neutralisation of clade 1 and 2 wild‐type and reverse‐genetics viruses was seen, with highest titres observed for viruses most closely related to the vaccine strain. There was no consistent relationship between vaccine dose given, or presence of aluminium adjuvant and cross‐neutralising antibody titre, possibly because of small sample size. Use of wild‐type highly pathogenic strains compared with antigenically equivalent reverse‐genetics viruses suggests presence of a higher level of cross‐neutralising antibody. >Conclusion  Vaccination with a clade 1 H5N1 virus elicited antibodies capable of neutralising diverse clade 2 H5N1 strains. This data underlines that while a close match between vaccine virus and circulating virus is important to achieve maximum protection, population priming with a ‘pre‐pandemic’ vaccine may be beneficial for the protection of a naïve population. The data suggests that use of reverse‐genetic viruses in neutralisation assays may underestimate the extent of cross‐protective antibody present following H5N1 vaccination.
机译:>背景高致病性禽流感A H5N1病毒广泛分布于世界各地,并已进化为进化枝1和2世系。它们的持续流通代表着严重的大流行威胁,刺激了人类疫苗开发的努力。最初的临床试验测试了从2004年流行的进化枝1株制备的疫苗。>方法疫苗接种后的血清来自基于A / Vietnam / 1194/2004 / NIBRG14的灭活分裂病毒疫苗的I期试验(对H5N1)进行了体外分析,以与从人类病例中分离出的高致病性野生型进化枝2 H5N1菌株及其相应的反向遗传衍生疫苗候选菌株进行交叉反应。 >结果观察到中性进化枝1和2的野生型和反向遗传病毒均被中和,与疫苗株最密切相关的病毒的滴度最高。疫苗剂量或铝佐剂的存在与交叉中和抗体滴度之间没有一致的关系,可能是由于样本量小。与抗原等效的反向遗传病毒相比,使用野生型高致病性菌株表明存在更高水平的交叉中和抗体。 >结论用进化枝1 H5N1病毒接种疫苗后,抗体能够中和不同的进化枝2 H5N1株。该数据强调,虽然疫苗病毒和流行病毒之间的紧密匹配对于实现最大程度的保护很重要,但使用“大流行前”疫苗引发的人群可能有益于保护幼稚的人群。数据表明,在中和试验中使用反向基因病毒可能会低估H5N1疫苗接种后存在的交叉保护抗体的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号