首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain and Behavior >Distinction between hand dominance and hand preference in primates: a behavioral investigation of manual dexterity in nonhuman primates (macaques) and human subjects
【2h】

Distinction between hand dominance and hand preference in primates: a behavioral investigation of manual dexterity in nonhuman primates (macaques) and human subjects

机译:灵长类动物的手优势和手偏爱之间的区别:非人类灵长类动物(猕猴)和人类受试者的手部敏捷行为的行为研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background The present study aimed to determine and confront hand preference (hand chosen in priority to perform a manual dexterity task) and hand dominance (hand with best motor performance) in eight macaques (Macaca fascicularis) and in 20 human subjects (10 left-handers and 10 right-handers). >Methods Four manual dexterity tests have been executed by the monkeys, over several weeks during learning and stable performance phases (in controlled body position): the modified Brinkman board, the reach and grasp drawer, the tube and the bimanual board tasks. Three behavioral tests, adapted versions from the monkeys tasks (modified Brinkman board, tube and bimanual board tasks), as well as a handedness questionnaire, have been conducted in human subjects. >Results In monkeys, there was a large disparity across individuals and motor tasks. For hand dominance, two monkeys were rather right lateralized, three monkeys rather left lateralized, whereas in three monkeys, the different parameters measured were not consistent. For hand preference, none of the eight monkeys exhibited a homogeneous lateralization across the four motor tasks. Macaca fascicularis do not exhibit a clear hand preference. Furthermore, hand preference often changed with task repetition, both during training and plateau phases. For human subjects, the hand preference mostly followed the self-assessment of lateralization by the subjects and the questionnaire (in the latter, right-handers were more lateralized than left-handers), except a few discrepancies based on the tube task. There was no hand dominance in seven right-handers (the other three performed better with the right hand) and in four left-handers. Five left-handers showed left-hand dominance, whereas surprisingly, one left-hander performed better with the right hand. In the modified Brinkman board task, females performed better than males, right-handers better than left-handers. >Conclusions The present study argues for a distinction between hand preference and hand dominance, especially in macaque monkeys.
机译:>背景本研究旨在确定和面对8只猕猴和20只猕猴中的手的偏爱(优先选择要执行手动敏捷性任务的手)和手的优势(具有最佳运动表现的手)。人类受试者(10个左撇子和10个右撇子)。 >方法:猴子在学习和稳定表现阶段(处于可控制的身体姿势)的几个星期内,进行了四次手动敏捷性测试:修改后的Brinkman板,伸手可及的抽屉,管子和双手董事会任务。已经在人类受试者中进行了三种行为测试,来自猴子任务的改编版本(修改后的Brinkman板,管子和双手板任务)以及一种惯性调查表。 >结果:在猴子中,个体和运动任务之间存在很大差异。对于手的优势,两只猴子偏右偏,三只猴子偏偏左,而在三只猴子中,所测量的不同参数不一致。出于手部偏爱,八只猴子中没有一只在四项运动任务中均表现出均匀的侧向性。猕猴没有表现出明显的手感。此外,在训练和平稳阶段,手的偏好常常随着任务的重复而改变。对于人类受试者,除了根据试管任务的一些差异外,大多数人的偏爱主要取决于受试者和问卷的自我评估(在后者中,右撇子比左撇子偏于偏右)。在七个惯用右手的人(其他三个用右手的表现更好)和四个左手的人中没有手的优势。五位左撇子显示出左手优势,而令人惊讶的是,一位左撇子的右手表现更好。在修改后的布林克曼董事会任务中,女性的表现要好于男性,右撇子要好于左撇子。 >结论:本研究主张在手的偏爱与手的优势之间存在区别,尤其是在猕猴中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号