首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Intensive Care >The pain agitation and delirium practice guidelines for adult critically ill patients: a post-publication perspective
【2h】

The pain agitation and delirium practice guidelines for adult critically ill patients: a post-publication perspective

机译:成人重症患者的疼痛躁动和ir妄实践指南:发布后的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The recently published Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit differ from earlier guidelines in the following ways: literature searches were performed in eight databases by a professional librarian; psychometric validation of assessment scales was considered in their recommendation; discrepancies in recommendation votes by guideline panel members are available in online supplements; and all recommendations were made exclusively on the basis of evidence available until December of 2010. Pain recognition and management remains challenging in the critically ill. Patient outcomes improve with routine pain assessment, use of co-analgesics and administration as well as dose adjustment of opiates to patient needs. Thoracic epidurals help ease patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. Little data exists to guide clinicians as to the type or dose of co-analgesics; no opiate choice is associated with better patient outcomes. Lighter or no sedation is beneficial, and interruption is desirable in patients who require deep sedation for specific pathologic states. Delirium screening is probably useful; no treatment modality can be unequivocally recommended, and the benefit of prophylaxis is established only for early mobilization. The details of these recommendations, as well as more recent publications that complement the guidelines, are provided in this commentary.
机译:最近发布的《重症监护病房成年患者疼痛,躁动和妄想管理临床实践指南》与以前的指南在以下方面有所不同:由专业图书馆员在八个数据库中进行文献检索;他们的建议中考虑了评估量表的心理计量学验证;在线补编中提供了指南小组成员的推荐票差异。并且所有建议都是根据截至2010年12月的可用证据提出的。在重病患者中,疼痛的识别和治疗仍然具有挑战性。通过常规的疼痛评估,使用联合镇痛药和给药以及根据患者需要调整鸦片剂量可以改善患者的预后。胸膜硬膜外麻醉有助于缓解接受腹主动脉手术的患者。几乎没有数据可以指导临床医生共镇痛药的类型或剂量。没有鸦片制剂与更好的患者预后相关。轻度镇静或不使用镇静剂是有益的,对于需要针对特定​​病理状态进行深度镇静的患者,中断治疗是可取的。妄筛查可能有用。不能明确建议没有任何治疗方式,而预防的好处仅在于早期动员。本评论提供了这些建议的详细信息以及补充指南的最新出版物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号