首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Three‐dimensional gamma criterion for patient‐specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams
【2h】

Three‐dimensional gamma criterion for patient‐specific quality assurance of spot scanning proton beams

机译:三维伽玛标准用于点扫描质子束的患者特定质量保证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of full three‐dimensional (3D) gamma algorithm for spot scanning proton fields, also referred to as pencil beam scanning (PBS) fields. The difference between the full 3D gamma algorithm and a simplified two‐dimensional (2D) version was presented. Both 3D and 2D gamma algorithms are used for dose evaluations of clinical proton PBS fields. The 3D gamma algorithm was implemented in an in‐house software program without resorting to 2D interpolations perpendicular to the proton beams at the depths of measurement. Comparison between calculated and measured dose points was carried out directly using Euclidian distance in 3D space and the dose difference as a fourth dimension. Note that this 3D algorithm faithfully implemented the original concept proposed by Low et al. (1998) who described gamma criterion using 3D Euclidian distance and dose difference. Patient‐specific proton PBS plans are separated into two categories, depending on their optimization method: single‐field optimization (SFO) or multifield optimized (MFO). A total of 195 measurements were performed for 58 SFO proton fields. A MFO proton plan with four fields was also calculated and measured, although not used for treatment. Typically three different depths were selected from each field for measurements. Each measurement was analyzed by both 3D and 2D gamma algorithms. The resultant 3D and 2D gamma passing rates are then compared and analyzed. Comparison between 3D and 2D gamma passing rates of SFO fields showed that 3D algorithm does show higher passing rates than its 2D counterpart toward the distal end, while little difference is observed at depths away from the distal end. Similar phenomenon in the lateral penumbra was well documented in photon radiation therapy, and in fact brought about the concept of gamma criterion. Although 2D gamma algorithm has been shown to suffice in addressing dose comparisons in lateral penumbra for photon intensity‐modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, results here showed that a full 3D algorithm is required for proton dose comparisons due to the existence of Bragg peaks and distal penumbra. A MFO proton plan with four fields was also measured and analyzed. Sharp dose gradients exist in MFO proton fields, both in the middle of the modulation and toward the most distal layers. Decreased 2D gamma passing rates at locations of high dose gradient are again observed as in the SFO fields. Results confirmed that a full 3D algorithm for gamma criterion is needed for proton PBS plan's dose comparisons. The 3D gamma algorithm is implemented by an in‐house software program. Patient‐specific proton PBS plans are measured and analyzed using both 3D and 2D gamma algorithms. For measurements performed at depths with large dose gradients along the beam direction, gamma comparison passing rates using 2D algorithm is lower than those obtained with the full 3D algorithm.PACS number: 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Jw, 87.55.de, 87.55.kd, 87.55.ne, 87.55.Qr
机译:本研究的目的是评估完整的三维(3D)伽玛算法对点扫描质子场(也称为铅笔束扫描(PBS)场)的有效性。提出了完整的3D伽玛算法和简化的二维(2D)版本之间的区别。 3D和2D伽玛算法均用于临床质子PBS场的剂量评估。 3D伽马算法是在内部软件程序中实现的,而无需求助于在测量深度处垂直于质子束的2D插值。直接使用3D空间中的欧氏距离和剂量差作为第四维,对计算的剂量点和测量的剂量点进行比较。请注意,此3D算法忠实地实现了Low等人提出的原始概念。 (1998)用3D欧几里得距离和剂量差描述了伽马准则。特定于患者的质子PBS计划根据其优化方法分为两类:单场优化(SFO)或多场优化(MFO)。对58个SFO质子场进行了195次测量。尽管没有用于治疗,但也计算并测量了具有四个场的MFO质子计划。通常,从每个字段中选择三个不同的深度进行测量。每次测量均通过3D和2D伽玛算法进行分析。然后比较和分析所得的3D和2D伽玛通过率。 SFO场的3D和2D伽玛通过率之间的比较表明,3D算法确实比其2D同行朝着远端具有更高的通过率,而在远离远端的深度处观察到的差异很小。在光子放射疗法中已很好地证明了外侧半影中的类似现象,并且实际上带来了伽玛标准的概念。尽管已显示2D伽马算法足以解决光子强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)计划中的半影侧影剂量比较,但此处的结果表明,由于存在布拉格峰和远侧半影。还测量和分析了具有四个场的MFO质子计划。 MFO质子场中存在尖锐的剂量梯度,既在调制的中间,也朝着最远的层。如在SFO场中一样,在高剂量梯度位置再次观察到2D伽马通过率降低。结果证实,质子PBS计划的剂量比较需要完整的3Dγ算法算法。 3D伽玛算法由内部软件程序实现。使用3D和2D伽玛算法对患者特定的质子PBS计划进行测量和分析。对于沿光束方向具有大剂量梯度的深度进行的测量,使用2D算法的伽玛比较通过率低于使用完整3D算法获得的伽玛比较通过率.PACS编号:87.53.Bn,87.53.Jw,87.55.de,87.55.kd ,87.55.ne,87.55.Qr

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号