首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Machine learning‐based classification of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients by eight gene expression profiles
【2h】

Machine learning‐based classification of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients by eight gene expression profiles

机译:基于机器学习的八种基因表达谱对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gene expression profiling (GEP) had divided the diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into molecular subgroups: germinal center B‐cell like (GCB), activated B‐cell like (ABC), and unclassified (UC) subtype. However, this classification with prognostic significance was not applied into clinical practice since there were more than 1000 genes to detect and interpreting was difficult. To classify cancer samples validly, eight significant genes (MYBL1, LMO2, BCL6, MME, IRF4, NFKBIZ, PDE4B, and SLA) were selected in 414 patients treated with CHOP/R‐CHOP chemotherapy from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data sets. Cutoffs for each gene were obtained using receiver–operating characteristic curves ( style="fixed-case">ROC) new model based on the support vector machine ( style="fixed-case">SVM) estimated the probability of membership into one of two subgroups: style="fixed-case">GCB and Non‐ style="fixed-case">GCB ( style="fixed-case">ABC and style="fixed-case">UC). Furtherly, multivariate analysis validated the model in another two cohorts including 855 cases in all. As a result, patients in the training and validated cohorts were stratified into two subgroups with 94.0%, 91.0%, and 94.4% concordance with style="fixed-case">GEP, respectively. Patients with Non‐ style="fixed-case">GCB subtype had significantly poorer outcomes than that with style="fixed-case">GCB subtype, which agreed with the prognostic power of style="fixed-case">GEP classification. Moreover, the similar prognosis received in the low (0–2) and high (3–5) style="fixed-case">IPI scores group demonstrated that the new model was independent of style="fixed-case">IPI as well as style="fixed-case">GEP method. In conclusion, our new model could stratify style="fixed-case">DLBCL patients with style="fixed-case">CHOP/R‐ style="fixed-case">CHOP regimen matching style="fixed-case">GEP subtypes effectively.
机译:基因表达谱(GEP)将弥散性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)分为分子亚组:生发中心B细胞样(GCB),活化B细胞样(ABC)和未分类(UC)亚型。但是,这种具有预后意义的分类没有应用于临床实践,因为有1000多个基因难以检测和解释。为了有效地对癌症样本进行分类,从Gene Expression Omnibus(GEO)数据集中选择了414例接受CHOP / R-CHOP化疗的患者,选择了八个重要基因(MYBL1,LMO2,BCL6,MME,IRF4,NFKBIZ,PDE4B和SLA)。每个基因的截断值都是使用基于支持向量机( style =“ fixed-case”> ROM )的接收者操作特征曲线( style =“ fixed-case”> ROC )新模型获得的/ span>)估计成为两个子组之一的可能性: style =“ fixed-case”> GCB 和Non- style =“ fixed-case”> GCB (< span style =“ fixed-case”> ABC 和 style =“ fixed-case”> UC )。此外,多变量分析在另外两个队列中验证了该模型,包括总共855个案例。结果,将接受训练的患者和经验证的队列患者分为两个亚组,分别与 style =“ fixed-case”> GEP 一致,分别为94.0%,91.0%和94.4%。与 style =“ fixed-case”> GCB 亚型相比,非 style =“ fixed-case”> GCB 亚型患者的预后差得多,这与预后能力相符 style =“ fixed-case”> GEP 分类。此外,在 style =“ fixed-case”> IPI 评分低(0–2)和高(3–5)评分组中获得的相似预后表明,新模型与 style = “ fixed-case”> IPI 以及 style =“ fixed-case”> GEP 方法。总之,我们的新模型可以将 style =“ fixed-case”> DLBCL 患者与 style =“ fixed-case”> CHOP / R- style =“ fixed- case“> CHOP 方案可有效匹配 style =” fixed-case“> GEP 子类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号