首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Hematology Oncology >Azacitidine front-line in 339 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: comparison of French-American-British and World Health Organization classifications
【2h】

Azacitidine front-line in 339 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: comparison of French-American-British and World Health Organization classifications

机译:阿扎胞苷一线治疗339例骨髓增生异常综合症和急性髓性白血病患者:法裔美裔和世界卫生组织分类的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe MDS-IWG and NCCN currently endorse both FAB and WHO classifications of MDS and AML, thus allowing patients with 20–30 % bone marrow blasts (AML20–30, formerly MDS-RAEB-t) to be categorised and treated as either MDS or AML. In addition, an artificial distinction between AML20–30 and AML30+ was made by regulatory agencies by initially restricting approval of azacitidine to AML20–30. Thus, uncertainty prevails regarding the diagnosis, prognosis and optimal treatment timing and strategy for patients with AML20–30. Here, we aim to provide clarification for patients treated with azacitidine front-line.
机译:背景MDS-IWG和NCCN目前都支持FAB和WHO对MDS和AML的分类,因此可以将具有20-30%骨髓母细胞(AML20-30,以前称为MDS-RAEB-t)的患者归类为MDS或反洗钱。此外,监管机构通过最初限制将阿扎胞苷批准用于AML20-30,从而在AML20-30和AML30 +之间人为地加以区分。因此,对于AML20-30患者的诊断,预后以及最佳治疗时机和策略尚不确定。在这里,我们旨在为使用阿扎胞苷一线治疗的患者提供澄清。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号