首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Carbon storage in Chinas forest ecosystems: estimation by different integrative methods
【2h】

Carbon storage in Chinas forest ecosystems: estimation by different integrative methods

机译:中国森林生态系统的碳储量:不同综合方法的估算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Carbon (C) storage for all the components, especially dead mass and soil organic carbon, was rarely reported and remained uncertainty in China's forest ecosystems. This study used field‐measured data published between 2004 and 2014 to estimate C storage by three forest type classifications and three spatial interpolations and assessed the uncertainty in C storage resulting from different integrative methods in China's forest ecosystems. The results showed that C storage in China's forest ecosystems ranged from 30.99 to 34.96 Pg C by the six integrative methods. We detected 5.0% variation (coefficient of variation, CV, %) among the six methods, which was influenced mainly by soil C estimates. Soil C density and storage in the 0–100 cm soil layer were estimated to be 136.11–153.16 Mg C·ha−1 and 20.63–23.21 Pg C, respectively. Dead mass C density and storage were estimated to be 3.66–5.41 Mg C·ha−1 and 0.68–0.82 Pg C, respectively. Mean C storage in China's forest ecosystems estimated by the six integrative methods was 8.557 Pg C (25.8%) for aboveground biomass, 1.950 Pg C (5.9%) for belowground biomass, 0.697 Pg C (2.1%) for dead mass, and 21.958 Pg C (66.2%) for soil organic C in the 0–100 cm soil layer. The R:S ratio was 0.23, and C storage in the soil was 2.1 times greater than in the vegetation. Carbon storage estimates with respect to forest type classification (38 forest subtypes) were closer to the average value than those calculated using the spatial interpolation methods. Variance among different methods and data sources may partially explain the high uncertainty of C storage detected by different studies. This study demonstrates the importance of using multimethodological approaches to estimate C storage accurately in the large‐scale forest ecosystems.
机译:很少报道所有成分的碳(C)存储量,尤其是死质量和土壤有机碳,并且在中国森林生态系统中仍然存在不确定性。本研究使用2004年至2014年间发布的现场测量数据,通过三种森林类型分类和三种空间插值法估算了碳储量,并评估了中国森林生态系统中不同整合方法导致的碳储量不确定性。结果表明,通过六种综合方法,中国森林生态系统中的碳储存量在30.99至34.96 Pg之间。在这六种方法中,我们检测到5.0%的变化(变化系数,CV,%),这主要受土壤C估算的影响。在0-100 cm土层中土壤C的密度和储存量分别为136.11-153.16 Mg C·ha -1 和20.63-23.21 PgC。死质量C密度和储存量分别估计为3.66–5.41 Mg C·ha -1 和0.68–0.82 PgC。通过六种综合方法估算的中国森林生态系统中的碳平均储量为地上生物量为8.557 Pg C(25.8%),地下生物量为1.950 Pg C(5.9%),净重为0.697 Pg C(2.1%)和21.958 Pg 0-100厘米土壤层中土壤有机碳的碳(66.2%)。 R:S比为0.23,土壤中的C储量是植被的2.1倍。关于森林类型分类(38个森林亚型)的碳储量估算值比使用空间插值方法计算的碳储量估算值更接近平均值。不同方法和数据源之间的差异可能部分解释了不同研究检测到的C储存的高度不确定性。这项研究证明了在大型森林生态系统中使用多方法学方法准确估算碳储存的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号