首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Diet analysis in piscivorous birds: What can the addition of molecular tools offer?
【2h】

Diet analysis in piscivorous birds: What can the addition of molecular tools offer?

机译:食肉鸟的饮食分析:分子工具的添加还能提供什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In trophic studies on piscivorous birds, it is vital to know which kind of dietary sample provides the information of interest and how the prey can be identified reliably and efficiently. Often, noninvasively obtained dietary samples such as regurgitated pellets, feces, and regurgitated fish samples are the preferred source of information. Fish prey has usually been identified via morphological analysis of undigested hard parts, but molecular approaches are being increasingly used for this purpose. What remains unknown, however, is which dietary sample type is best suited for molecular diet analysis and how the molecular results compare to those obtained by morphological analysis. Pellets, feces, and regurgitated fish samples of Great Cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) were examined for prey using both morphological hard part analysis and molecular prey identification. The sample types and methods were compared regarding number of species detected (overall and per sample) as well as the prey species composition and its variability among individual samples. Via molecular analysis, significantly higher numbers of prey species were detected in pellets, feces, and fish samples. Of the three sample types, pellets contained the most comprehensive trophic information and could be obtained with the lowest sampling effort. Contrastingly, dietary information obtained from feces was least informative and most variable. For all sample types, the molecular approach outperformed morphological hard part identification regarding the detectable prey spectrum and prey species composition. We recommend the use of pellets in combination with molecular prey identification to study the diet of piscivorous birds.
机译:在对食肉性鸟类的营养研究中,至关重要的是要知道哪种饮食样本可以提供感兴趣的信息,以及如何可靠而有效地识别猎物。通常,首选的信息来源是无创获得的饮食样品,例如反流的颗粒,粪便和反流的鱼样品。通常通过未消化的硬质部分的形态分析来鉴定鱼类的猎物,但是为此目的越来越多地使用分子方法。然而,仍然未知的是哪种饮食样品类型最适合分子饮食分析,以及分子结果与通过形态分析获得的结果如何比较。使用形态学的硬部分分析和分子猎物鉴定,对Cor(Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis)的丸,粪便和反水鱼类样品进行了猎物检查。比较了样本类型和方法,包括检测到的物种数量(整体和每个样本)以及猎物的物种组成及其在各个样本中的变异性。通过分子分析,在颗粒,粪便和鱼类样品中检测到大量捕食物种。在这三种样品类型中,颗粒包含最全面的营养信息,并且可以用最少的采样工作量获得。相反,从粪便获得的饮食信息信息最少,变化最大。对于所有类型的样本,就可检测的猎物谱和猎物种类组成而言,分子方法都优于形态学上的硬部分识别。我们建议结合使用颗粒和分子猎物鉴定来研究食肉鸟的饮食。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号