首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Radiation Research >Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
【2h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood

机译:质子束疗法降低儿童髓母细胞瘤耳蜗剂量的成本-效果分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction compared with conventional X-ray radiotherapy for medulloblastoma in childhood. Methods: We developed a Markov model to describe health states of 6-year-old children with medulloblastoma after treatment with proton or X-ray radiotherapy. The risks of hearing loss were calculated on cochlear dose for each treatment. Three types of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D were used for estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for proton beam therapy compared with X-ray radiotherapy was calculated for each HRQOL. Sensitivity analyses were performed to model uncertainty in these parameters. Results: The ICER for EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D were $21 716/QALY, $11 773/QALY, and $20 150/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses found that the results were sensitive to discount rate, the risk of hearing loss after proton therapy, and costs of proton irradiation. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analysis revealed a 99% probability of proton therapy being cost effective at a societal willingness-to-pay value. Conclusions: Proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction improves health outcomes at a cost that is within the acceptable cost-effectiveness range from the payer's standpoint.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估与传统的X射线放射治疗相比,儿童质子束疗法与耳蜗剂量降低相比,质子束疗法的成本效益。方法:我们开发了一个马尔可夫模型,描述了质子或X射线放射治疗后的6岁儿童髓母细胞瘤的健康状况。根据每种治疗的耳蜗剂量计算听力损失的风险。 EQ-5D,HUI3和SF-6D的三种与健康有关的生活质量(HRQOL)用于估计质量调整生命年(QALYs)。计算每个HRQOL质子束治疗与X射线放射治疗相比的增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行敏感性分析以对这些参数中的不确定性建模。结果:EQ-5D,HUI3和SF-6D的ICER分别为21716美元/ QALY,11773美元/ QALY和20150美元/ QALY。单向敏感性分析发现,该结果对折现率,质子治疗后听力损失的风险以及质子辐照成本敏感。成本效益可接受性曲线分析显示,在社会愿意付款的情况下,质子治疗有99%的成本效益。结论:降低耳蜗剂量的质子束疗法可改善健康状况,其费用在付款人的角度范围内处于可接受的成本效益范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号