首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
【2h】

To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins

机译:喂还是不喂?哺乳期海豚中恐惧驱动行为的生物能影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging behavior is inextricably linked to predation risk. But quantification of foraging energetics for lactating animals under predation risk is less understood. In this study, we used a spatially explicit individual‐based model to study how changes in physiology (lactating or not) and the environment (predation risk) affect optimal behavior in dolphins. Specifically, we predicted that an adult dolphin without calf would incur lower relative energetic costs compared to a lactating dolphin with calf regardless of predation risk severity, antipredator behavior, or prey quality consumed. Under this state‐dependent analysis of risk approach, we found predation risk to be a stronger driver in affecting total energetic costs (foraging plus locomotor costs) than food quality for both dolphin types. Further, contrary to our hypothesis, after accounting for raised energy demands, a lactating dolphin with calf does not necessarily have higher relative‐to‐baseline costs than a dolphin without calf. Our results indicate that both a lactating (with calf) and non‐lactating dolphin incur lowered energetic costs under a risk‐averse behavioral scheme, but consequently suffer from lost foraging calories. A lactating dolphin with calf could be particularly worse off in lost foraging calories under elevated predation risk, heightened vigilance, and increased hiding time relative to an adult dolphin without calf. Further, hiding time in refuge could be more consequential than detection distance for both dolphin types in estimated costs and losses incurred. In conclusion, our study found that reproductive status is an important consideration in analyzing risk effects in mammals, especially in animals with lengthy lactation periods and those exposed to both biological and nonbiological stressors.
机译:在哺乳动物中,泌乳可能是生殖周期中能量上最昂贵的部分。因此,当由于捕食风险,环境干扰或资源匮乏而使能源需求受损时,可能会影响未来的生殖成功。在海洋和陆地环境中,觅食行为与捕食风险密不可分。但是,对捕食风险下的哺乳动物觅食能量的定量化了解较少。在这项研究中,我们使用了基于空间的,基于个体的模型来研究生理变化(是否泌乳)和环境变化(捕食风险)如何影响海豚的最佳行为。具体而言,我们预测,与捕食带有小牛的海豚相比,没有捕食小牛的成年海豚将产生较低的相对能量消耗,而不论捕食风险的严重性,反捕食者的行为或所消耗的猎物质量如何。在这种基于状态的风险分析方法中,我们发现,相比两种海豚而言,捕食风险是影响总能量成本(觅食加运动成本)的重要驱动力。此外,与我们的假设相反,考虑到能源需求的增加,带有小牛的哺乳海豚不一定比没有小牛的海豚具有相对于基线的成本更高的成本。我们的结果表明,在规避风险的行为方案下,哺乳期(小牛)和非哺乳期海豚都降低了精力成本,但因此会损失觅食卡路里。与没有小牛的成年海豚相比,有小牛的泌乳海豚在掠食风险增加,警惕性提高和隐藏时间增加的情况下,觅食卡路里的损失可能会更糟。此外,在估计的成本和所造成的损失中,对于两种类型的海豚而言,在避难所中的躲藏时间可能比检测距离更重要。总之,我们的研究发现,生殖状态是分析哺乳动物(尤其是哺乳期长的动物以及暴露于生物和非生物应激源的动物)的风险影响时的重要考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号