首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hepatology Communications >Exploring opportunities to prevent cirrhosis admissions in the emergency department: A multicenter multidisciplinary survey
【2h】

Exploring opportunities to prevent cirrhosis admissions in the emergency department: A multicenter multidisciplinary survey

机译:在急诊科中探索预防肝硬化入院的机会:多中心多学科调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with cirrhosis have high admission and readmission rates, and it is estimated that a quarter are potentially preventable. Little data are available regarding nonmedical factors impacting triage decisions in this patient population. This study sought to explore such factors as well as to determine provider perspectives on low‐acuity clinical presentations to the emergency department, including ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. A survey was distributed in four liver transplant centers to both emergency medicine and hepatology providers, who included attending physicians, house staff, and advanced practitioners; 196 surveys were returned (estimated response rate 50.6%). Emergency medicine providers identified several influential nonmedical factors impacting inpatient triage decisions, including input from a hepatologist (77.7%), inadequate patient access to outpatient specialty care (68.6%), and patient need for diagnostic testing for a procedure (65.6%). When given patient‐based scenarios of low‐acuity cases, such as ascites requiring paracentesis, only 7.0% believed patients should be hospitalized while 48.9% said these patients would be hospitalized at their institution (P < 0.0001). For mild hepatic encephalopathy, the comparable numbers were 19.5% and 55.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Several perceived barriers were cited for this discrepancy, including limited resources both in the outpatient setting and emergency department. Most providers believed that an emergency department observation unit protocol would influence triage toward an emergency department observation unit visit instead of inpatient admission for both ascites requiring large volume paracentesis (83.2%) and mild hepatic encephalopathy (79.4%). Conclusion: Many nonmedical factors that influence inpatient triage for patients with cirrhosis could be targeted for quality improvement initiatives. In some scenarios, providers are limited by resource availability, which results in triage to an inpatient admission even when they believe this is not the most appropriate disposition. (Hepatology Communications 2018;2:237‐244)
机译:肝硬化患者的入院率和再入院率很高,据估计有四分之一是可以预防的。关于影响该患者人群分诊决定的非医学因素,几乎没有可用的数据。这项研究试图探讨这些因素,并确定提供者对急诊部门低眼压临床表现的看法,包括腹水和肝性脑病。在四个肝移植中心向急诊医学和肝病学提供者进行了一项调查,其中包括主治医师,房屋工作人员和高级从业人员。返回196个调查(估计答复率为50.6%)。急诊医疗服务提供者确定了影响住院分流决策的几种有影响力的非医学因素,包括肝病专家的意见(77.7%),患者无法获得门诊专科护理的人数(68.6%)以及患者对程序进行诊断测试的需求(65.6%)。在以患者为基础的低敏度情况下(例如需要腹腔穿刺的腹水),只有7.0%的患者认为应该住院,而48.9%的患者认为这些患者将在其所在机构住院(P <0.0001)。对于轻度肝性脑病,可比数字分别为19.5%和55.2%(P <0.001)。列举了一些导致这种差异的障碍,包括门诊和急诊部门的资源有限。大多数提供者认为,对于需要大量穿刺术的腹水(占83.2%)和轻度肝性脑病(占79.4%),急诊科观察室方案会影响分流,而不是住院入院。结论:影响肝硬化患者住院分诊的许多非医学因素可以作为质量改善计划的目标。在某些情况下,提供者受到资源可用性的限制,即使他们认为这不是最合适的处理方式,也会导致住院分流。 (Hepatology Communications 2018; 2:237-244)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号