首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with exemestane followed by response‐guided combination therapy with low‐dose cyclophosphamide in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer: A multicenter open‐label phase II study
【2h】

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with exemestane followed by response‐guided combination therapy with low‐dose cyclophosphamide in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer: A multicenter open‐label phase II study

机译:绝经后雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者采用依西美坦新辅助内分泌治疗然后采用反应指导联合低剂量环磷酰胺联合治疗:一项多中心开放标签II期研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancer are less likely to achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy may be more appropriate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy in these hormone‐sensitive patients. Most patients with ER‐positive breast cancer are postmenopausal, and therefore, generally older and less able to tolerate chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tailored neoadjuvant endocrine and chemoendocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Untreated patients with primary invasive ER‐positive, HER2‐negative, stage I‐IIIA breast cancer, and Ki67 index ≤30% were enrolled. Patients received exemestane 25 mg/d for 12 weeks. Based on clinical response and change in Ki67 index, assessed at 8‐12 weeks, patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) with Ki67 index ≤5% after treatment, or stable disease (SD) with Ki67 index ≤5% before and after treatment were defined as responders. For the subsequent 24 weeks, responders continued exemestane monotherapy (group A), and nonresponders received exemestane 25 mg/d plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg/d (group B). The primary endpoint was clinical response at weeks 24 and 36. A total of 59 patients (median age, 69 years) started initial exemestane monotherapy. After exclusion of three patients who discontinued during this period, 56 remained enrolled to receive subsequent treatment. Clinical response rates (CR and PR) and 95% CI at weeks 24 and 36 were 85% (12/14; 57.2%‐98.2%) and 71% (10/14; 41.9%‐91.6%), respectively, in group A; and 54% (23/42; 38.7%‐70.2%) and 71% (30/42; 55.4%‐84.3%), respectively, in group B. At week 36, no significant difference was found in median Ki67 index between the groups (3.5% and 4.0%). There were no treatment‐related deaths. We found that clinical response comparable to that of responders was achieved in nonresponders after addition of cyclophosphamide to the initial endocrine therapy.
机译:患有雌激素受体(ER)阳性的乳腺癌患者不太可能通过新辅助化疗实现病理完全缓解(pCR)。在这些激素敏感性患者中,新辅助内分泌治疗可能比新辅助化疗更合适。大多数ER阳性乳腺癌患者是绝经后的患者,因此通常年龄较大且不能耐受化疗。我们旨在研究定制的新辅助内分泌和化学内分泌疗法对绝经后乳腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。纳入未经治疗的原发性浸润性ER阳性,HER2阴性,I-IIIA期乳腺癌且Ki67指数≤30%的患者。患者接受依西美坦25 mg / d治疗12周。根据临床反应和Ki67指数的变化(在8-12周内评估),完全缓解(CR),治疗后Ki67指数≤5%的部分缓解(PR)或Ki67指数≤5的稳定疾病(SD)将治疗前后的%定义为反应者。在随后的24周中,有反应者继续进行依西美坦单药治疗(A组),无反应者接受依西美坦25 mg / d加环磷酰胺50 mg / d(B组)。主要终点指标是第24和36周的临床反应。共有59例患者(中位年龄69岁)开始了初始依西美坦单药治疗。在排除三名在此期间停药的患者后,仍有56名患者入组接受后续治疗。该组在第24周和第36周的临床缓解率(CR和PR)和95%CI分别为85%(12/14; 57.2%-98.2%)和71%(10/14; 41.9%-91.6%)一个; B组分别为54%(23/42; 38.7%‐70.2%)和71%(30/42; 55.4%‐84.3%)。在第36周时,两组之间的Ki67指数中位数无显着差异组(3.5%和4.0%)。没有与治疗有关的死亡。我们发现,在最初的内分泌治疗中加入环磷酰胺后,无反应者的临床反应可达到与反应者相当的临床反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号