首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Insect Science >A comparison of trapping techniques (Coleoptera: Carabidae Buprestidae Cerambycidae and Curculionoidea excluding Scolytinae)
【2h】

A comparison of trapping techniques (Coleoptera: Carabidae Buprestidae Cerambycidae and Curculionoidea excluding Scolytinae)

机译:诱捕技术的比较(鞘翅目:CarabidaeBuprestidaeCerambycidae和Curculionoidea不包括Scolytinae)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Beetles (Coleoptera) are a charismatic group of insects targeted by collectors and often used in biodiversity surveys. As part of a larger project, we surveyed a small (4 hectare) plot in the Boston Mountains of Arkansas using 70 traps of 12 trap types and Berlese–Tullgren extraction of leaf litter and identified all Buprestidae, Carabidae, Cerambycidae, and Curculionoidea (Anthribidae, Attelabidae, Brachyceridae, Brentidae, and Curculionidae excluding Scolytinae) to species. This resulted in the collection of 7,973 specimens representing 242 species arranged in 8 families. In a previous publication, we reported new state records and the number of specimens collected per species. In this publication, we used these data to determine the most effective collection method for four beetle groups: Carabidae, Cerambycidae, Curculionoidea (excluding Scolytinae), and Buprestidae. We found that the combination of pitfall and Malaise traps was most effective for Carabidae, Cerambycidae, and Curculionoidea, but that the combination of Malaise and green Lindgren funnel traps was most effective at collecting Buprestidae. Species accumulation curves did not become asymptotic and extrapolated rarefaction curves did not become asymptotic until 350–1,000 samples, suggesting that much more effort is required to completely inventory even a small site. Additionally, seasonal activity is presented for each species and the similarity and overlap between collecting dates and seasons is discussed for each family.
机译:甲虫(鞘翅目)是一种极具魅力的昆虫,被捕集者作为目标,经常在生物多样性调查中使用。作为较大项目的一部分,我们在阿肯色州波士顿山区调查了一个小块(4公顷)地块,使用了12个陷阱类型的70个陷阱,并提取了Berlese-Tullgren的落叶凋落物,并确定了所有的Buprestidae,Carabidae,Cerambycidae和Curculionoideaea(Anthribidae)。 ,A科,短尾科,B科和Cur科(不包括鞘翅目)。结果收集了7973个标本,代表8个科的242种。在先前的出版物中,我们报告了新的状态记录以及每个物种收集的标本数量。在本出版物中,我们使用这些数据来确定四个甲虫组的最有效收集方法:甲虫科,天牛科,葫芦科(不包括鞘翅目)和B科。我们发现,凹坑陷阱和Malaise陷阱的组合对Carabidae,Cerambycidae和Curculionoidea最为有效,但是Malaise和绿色Lindgren漏斗陷阱的组合对收集Buprestidae最有效。直到350–1,000个样本时,物种积累曲线才变得渐近,外推稀疏曲线才变得渐近,这表明即使是一个很小的场所,也需要付出更多的努力才能完全盘点。此外,还介绍了每个物种的季节性活动,并针对每个家庭讨论了收集日期和季节之间的相似性和重叠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号