Conversion of forest to oil palm plantation'/> Replanting of first‐cycle oil palm results in a second wave of biodiversity loss
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Replanting of first‐cycle oil palm results in a second wave of biodiversity loss
【2h】

Replanting of first‐cycle oil palm results in a second wave of biodiversity loss

机译:第一轮油棕的重新种植导致第二次生物多样性丧失

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

class="enumerated" style="list-style-type:decimal" id="ece35218-list-0001">Conversion of forest to oil palm plantations results in a significant loss of biodiversity. Despite this, first‐cycle oil palm plantations can sustain relatively high biodiversity compared to other crops. However, the long‐term effects of oil palm agriculture on flora and fauna are unknown. Oil palm has a 25‐year commercial lifespan before it must be replanted, due to reduced productivity and difficulty of harvesting. Loss of the complex vegetation structure of oil palm plantations during the replanting process will likely have impacts on the ecosystem at a local and landscape scale. However, the effect of replanting on biodiversity is poorly understood.Here, we investigate the effects of replanting oil palm on soil macrofauna communities. We assessed ordinal richness, abundance, and community composition of soil macrofauna in first‐ (25‐ to 27‐year‐old) and second‐cycle oil palm (freshly cleared, 1‐year‐old, 3‐year‐old, and 7‐year‐old mature).Macrofauna abundance and richness drastically declined immediately after replanting. Macrofauna richness showed some recovery 7 years after replanting, but was still 19% lower than first‐cycle oil palm. Macrofauna abundance recovered to similar levels to that of first‐cycle oil palm plantations, 1 year after replanting. This was mainly due to high ant abundance, possibly due to the increased understory vegetation as herbicides are not used at this age. However, there were subsequent declines in macrofauna abundance 3 and 7 years after replanting, resulting in a 59% drop in macrofauna abundance compared to first‐cycle levels. Furthermore, soil macrofauna community composition in all ages of second‐cycle oil palm was different to first‐cycle plantations, with decomposers suffering particular declines.After considerable biodiversity loss due to forest conversion for oil palm, belowground invertebrate communities suffer a second wave of biodiversity loss due to replanting. This is likely to have serious implications for soil invertebrate diversity and agricultural sustainability in oil palm landscapes, due to the vital ecosystem functions that soil macrofauna provide.
机译:class =“ enumerated” style =“ list-style-type:decimal” id =“ ece35218-list-0001”> <!-list-behavior = enumerated prefix-word = mark-type = decimal max-label- size = 0-> 将森林转变为油棕人工林会导致生物多样性的严重丧失。尽管如此,与其他农作物相比,第一轮油棕种植园可以维持相对较高的生物多样性。但是,未知油棕农业对动植物的长期影响。由于生产力下降和收割困难,油棕必须重新种植才能使用,使用寿命为25年。补植过程中油棕人工林复杂植被结构的丧失可能会在局部和景观尺度上对生态系统产生影响。但是,重新种植对生物多样性的影响了解甚少。 在这里,我们研究了重新种植油棕对土壤大型动物群落的影响。我们评估了第一(25至27岁)和第二周期油棕(刚清除,1岁,3岁和7岁)的大型动物的序数丰富度,丰度和群落组成。岁的婴儿)。 大型动植物重新种植后,其丰富度和丰富度急剧下降。大型植物的丰富度在移栽后7年有所恢复,但仍比第一周期油棕低19%。重新种植后一年,大型动物的丰度恢复到与第一周期油棕人工林相似的水平。这主要是由于蚂蚁丰度高,可能是由于该年龄下未使用除草剂而增加了林下植被的缘故。但是,移栽后3年和7年后大型动物的丰度随之下降,与第一周期水平相比,大型动物的丰度下降了59%。此外,第二周期油棕各年龄段的土壤大型动物群落组成都不同于第一周期人工林,分解者的下降尤为明显。 由于油棕森林的转化,地下无脊椎动物导致生物多样性大量减少。社区由于补种而遭受了第二次生物多样性丧失的浪潮。由于土壤动物的重要生态系统功能,这可能对油棕景观中的无脊椎动物多样性和农业可持续性产生严重影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号