首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ChemistryOpen >Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO2 Capture
【2h】

Non‐Porous versus Mesoporous Siliceous Materials for CO2 Capture

机译:非多孔和介孔硅质材料用于二氧化碳捕集

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study, the adsorption properties of a Stöber silica‐based material towards CO2 were evaluated for the first time. The use of Stöber silica as support is interesting for real technological applications mainly due to economic factors. Furthermore, a direct comparison between the non porous Stöber sample with an ordered porous material (based on MCM‐41 silica) allowed to evaluate the effect of the porosity on the CO2 adsorption properties. In order to make silica materials reactive towards CO2, they were functionalized by introducing amino groups via grafting of 3‐[2‐(2‐aminoethyl)aminoethyl]aminopropyltrimethoxysilane. After a qualitative study of the CO2 adsorption, the quantitative determination of CO2 adsorption capacity at 35 °C revealed that the mesoporous material is more efficient compared to the Stöber‐based one (adsorption capacity values of 0.49 and 0.58 mol/kg for Stöber‐based and mesoporous samples). However, since the difference in the adsorption capacity is only about 15 % and the Stöber‐based sample is considerably cheaper, the non‐porous sample should be considered as a favourable adsorbent material for CO2 capture applications.
机译:在本研究中,首次评估了Stöber二氧化硅基材料对CO2的吸附性能。主要由于经济因素,在实际技术应用中使用Stöber二氧化硅作为载体非常有趣。此外,非多孔斯托伯样品与有序多孔材料(基于MCM-41二氧化硅)之间的直接比较可以评估孔隙率对CO2吸附性能的影响。为了使二氧化硅材料对CO2具有反应性,它们通过接枝3- [2-(2-(2-氨基乙基)氨基乙基]氨基乙基]氨基丙基三甲氧基硅烷引入氨基进行功能化。在对CO2吸附进行了定性研究之后,在35°C下对CO2吸附能力的定量测定表明,与基于Stöber的材料相比,中孔材料的效率更高(对于基于Stöber的材料,吸附能力值分别为0.49和0.58µmol / kg和中孔样品)。但是,由于吸附能力的差异仅约15%,并且基于Stöber的样品便宜得多,因此,无孔样品应被视为对CO2捕集应用有利的吸附材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号