首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Korean Medical Science >A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Multi-Center Therapeutic Confirmatory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Avanafil in Korean Patients with Erectile Dysfunction
【2h】

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Multi-Center Therapeutic Confirmatory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Avanafil in Korean Patients with Erectile Dysfunction

机译:一项随机安慰剂对照双盲多中心治疗性验证性研究以评估阿瓦那非在韩国勃起功能障碍患者中的​​安全性和有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with 158 subjects who were randomized to placebo or avanafil 50, 100, and 200 mg on demand for 8 weeks to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of avanafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in Korean men. The primary outcome was the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included changes in the scores of IIEF questions 3 and 4 (IIEF Q3, Q4) from baseline, changes in all domain scores in the IIEF from baseline, Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2–5 (SEP2–5), the Global Efficacy Assessment Question (GEAQ), and the number of subjects whose EF domain score at the 8th week visit was ≥ 26. After 8 weeks of treatment, the dose groups except avanafil 50 mg scored significantly higher on the IIEF-EF domain from baseline than the placebo group. The changes from baseline in the avanafil group in IIEF Q3 (all doses) and Q4 (200 mg alone) were higher than the placebo group. The differences between avanafil and placebo groups were significant in SEP2 (100 and 200 mg) and SEP3–5 (200 mg). The differences in the GEAQ “Yes” response were also significant in the avanafil 100 and 200 mg groups. Regarding the ratio of normal EF at the end of the study, avanafil 200 mg differed significantly from the placebo. Most treatment-associated adverse events were mild and resolved spontaneously. This is a clinical trial study and was registered at (Identifier: ).
机译:对158名受试者进行了一项多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究,随机分配安慰剂或avanafil 50、100和200 mg,持续8周,以评估avanafil的安全性,耐受性和疗效在韩国男性中治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)。主要结果是国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)问卷中的勃起功能(EF)域得分。次要结果包括IIEF问题3和4(IIEF Q3,Q4)相对于基线的得分变化,IIEF中所有领域得分相对于基线的变化,性接触问题2-5(SEP2-5),全球效能评估问题(GEAQ),在第8周就诊时EF域得分≥26的受试者人数。治疗8周后,除avanafil 50 mg以外的剂量组在IIEF-EF域的基线得分均较安慰剂组高得多组。 IIEF Q3(所有剂量)和Q4(仅200 mg)的avanafil组相对于基线的变化均高于安慰剂组。 avanafil组和安慰剂组之间的差异在SEP2(100和200 mg)和SEP3-5(200 mg)中很明显。 avanafil 100和200 mg组的GEAQ“是”响应差异也很明显。关于研究结束时正常EF的比例,200 mg avanafil与安慰剂有显着差异。大多数与治疗相关的不良事件是轻度的,并且可以自发解决。这是一项临床试验研究,已在(标识符:)注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号