首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages
【2h】

The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages

机译:松鸡高沼地管理不同方面对非目标鸟类群的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

class="enumerated" style="list-style-type:decimal" id="ece35613-list-0001">Conflict between stakeholders with opposing interests can hamper biodiversity conservation. When conflicts become entrenched, evidence from applied ecology can reveal new ways forward for their management. In particular, where disagreement exists over the efficacy or ethics of management actions, research clarifying the uncertain impacts of management on wildlife can move debates forwards to conciliation.Here, we explore a case‐study of entrenched conflict where uncertainty exists over the impacts of multiple management actions: namely, moorlands managed for the shooting of red grouse (willow ptarmigan) Lagopus lagopus in the United Kingdom (UK). Debate over how UK moorlands should be managed is increasingly polarized. We evaluate, for the first time at a regional scale, the relative impacts of two major moorland management practices—predator control and heather burning—on nontarget bird species of conservation concern.Birds were surveyed on 18 estates across Northern England and Southeast Scotland. Sites ranged from intensively managed grouse moors to moorland sites with no management for grouse shooting. We hypothesised that both targeted predator control and burning regimes would enhance ground‐nesting wader numbers and, as a consequence of this, and of increased grouse numbers, nontarget avian predators should also be more abundant on heavily managed sites.There were positive associations between predator control and the abundance of the three most widespread species of ground‐nesting wader: strong effects for European golden plover Pluvialis apricaria and Eurasian curlew Numenius arquata and, less strongly, for common snipe Gallinago gallinago. These effects saturated at low levels of predator control. Evidence for effects of burning was much weaker. We found no evidence of enhanced numbers of nontarget predators on heavily managed sites.
机译:class =“ enumerated” style =“ list-style-type:decimal” id =“ ece35613-list-0001”> <!-list-behavior =列举的prefix-word = mark-type = decimal max-label- size = 0-> 利益相关者之间的冲突会阻碍生物多样性的保护。当冲突变得根深蒂固时,来自应用生态学的证据可以揭示管理冲突的新方法。尤其是,在对管理行为的效力或道德准则存在分歧的情况下,澄清管理对野生动植物的不确定影响的研究可以将辩论推向和解。 在这里,我们探讨了根深蒂固的冲突的案例研究,其中多种管理措施的影响存在不确定性:即在英国(UK)为射击红松鸡(杨柳雷鬼)Lagopus lagopus而管理的高沼地。关于应如何管理英国高沼地的争论日益两极化。我们首次在区域范围内评估了两种主要的荒地管理措施(捕食者控制和希瑟燃烧)对保护目标的非目标鸟类的相对影响。 在整个18个庄园中调查了鸟类英格兰北部和苏格兰东南部。场地范围从集约化管理的松鸡沼泽到不进行松鸡射击管理的荒地。我们假设,有针对性的捕食者控制和焚烧制度都会增加地面嵌套的涉水数量,因此,在松鸡数量增加的情况下,在管理有序的地点,非目标禽类捕食者也应更加丰富。
  • 捕食者的控制与三种最广泛的陆栖涉水种类之间存在正相关关系:对欧洲金plPluvialis apricaria和欧亚curlNumenius arquata的强烈影响,对普通snGallinago gallinago的影响较小。这些影响在低水平的捕食者控制下达到饱和。燃烧效果的证据要弱得多。我们发现没有证据表明在受到严格管理的站点上非目标捕食者的数量有所增加。
  • 著录项

    相似文献

    • 外文文献
    • 中文文献
    • 专利
    代理获取

    客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

    京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
    • 客服微信

    • 服务号