首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Behavioral Medicine >Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used
【2h】

Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used

机译:评估行为改变技术在健康相关行为中的有效性:对所用方法的范围回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Behavior change interventions typically contain multiple potentially active components: behavior change techniques (BCTs). Identifying which specific BCTs or BCT combinations have the potential to be effective for a given behavior in a given context presents a major challenge. The aim of this study was to review the methods that have been used to identify effective BCTs for given behaviors in given contexts and evaluate their strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted of studies that had sought to identify effective BCTs. Articles referring to “behavio(u)r change technique(s)” in the abstract/text were located, and ones that involved identification of effective BCTs were selected. The methods reported were coded. The methods were analyzed in general terms using “PASS” criteria: Practicability (facility to apply the method appropriately), Applicability (facility to generalize from findings to contexts and populations of interest), Sensitivity (facility to identify effective BCTs), and Specificity (facility to rule out ineffective BCTs). A sample of 10% of the studies reviewed was then evaluated using these criteria to assess how far the strengths and limitations identified in principle were borne out in practice. One hundred and thirty-five studies were identified. The methods used in those studies were experimental manipulation of BCTs, observational studies comparing outcomes in the presence or absence of BCTs, meta-analyses of BCT comparisons, meta-regressions evaluating effect sizes with and without specific BCTs, reviews of BCTs found in effective interventions, and meta-classification and regression trees. The limitations of each method meant that only weak conclusions could be drawn regarding the effectiveness of specific BCTs or BCT combinations. Methods for identifying effective BCTs linked to target behavior and context all have important inherent limitations. A strategy needs to be developed that can systematically combine the strengths of the different methods and that can link these constructs in an ontology of behavior change interventions.
机译:行为更改干预通常包含多个潜在的活动组件:行为更改技术(BCT)。识别哪些特定的BCT或BCT组合对于给定背景下的给定行为可能有效是一个重大挑战。这项研究的目的是回顾用于确定给定环境下给定行为的有效BCT的方法,并评估其优势和局限性。对试图确定有效BCT的研究进行了范围界定审查。找到了在摘要/文本中提及“行为改变技术”的文章,并选择了涉及识别有效BCT的文章。报告的方法已编码。使用“通过”标准对这些方法进行了一般性分析:实用性(适当地应用该方法的便利性),适用性(从研究结果到感兴趣的背景和人群进行概括的便利性),敏感性(识别有效BCT的便利性)和特异性(排除无效BCT的便利)。然后,使用这些标准对所审查研究的10%样本进行评估,以评估在实践中证实原则上确定的优势和局限性的程度。鉴定了135项研究。这些研究中使用的方法是实验性BCT操作,观察性研究以比较存在或不存在BCT的结果,BCT比较的荟萃分析,评估有无特定BCT的效果大小的荟萃回归,对有效干预措施中发现的BCT的回顾,以及元分类和回归树。每种方法的局限性意味着,对于特定BCT或BCT组合的有效性只能得出微弱的结论。识别与目标行为和背景相关的有效BCT的方法都有重要的固有局限性。需要开发一种策略,该策略可以系统地结合不同方法的优势,并且可以将这些结构链接到行为改变干预的本体中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号