首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Behavioral Medicine >Are physical activity interventions for healthy inactive adults effective in promoting behavior change and maintenance and which behavior change techniques are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Are physical activity interventions for healthy inactive adults effective in promoting behavior change and maintenance and which behavior change techniques are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:对不活跃的健康成年人进行体育锻炼干预是否能有效促进行为改变和维持哪些行为改变技术有效?系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior relate to poor health outcomes independently. Healthy inactive adults are a key target population for prevention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of physical activity and/or sedentary behavior interventions, measured postintervention (behavior change) and at follow-up (behavior change maintenance), to identify behavior change techniques (BCT) within, and report on fidelity. Included studies were randomized controlled trials, targeting healthy inactive adults, aiming to change physical activity and/or sedentary behavior, with a minimum postintervention follow-up of 6 months, using 16 databases from 1990. Two reviewers independently coded risk of bias, the “Template for Intervention Description and Replication” (TIDieR) checklist, and BCTs. Twenty-six studies were included; 16 pooled for meta-analysis. Physical activity interventions were effective at changing behavior (d = 0.32, 95% confidence intervals = 0.16–0.48, n = 2,346) and maintaining behavior change after 6 months or more (d = 0.21, 95% confidence intervals = 0.12–0.30, n = 2,190). Sedentary behavior interventions (n = 2) were not effective. At postintervention, physical activity intervention effectiveness was associated with the BCTs “Biofeedback,” “Demonstration of the behavior,” “Behavior practice/rehearsal,” and “Graded tasks.” At follow-up, effectiveness was associated with using “Action planning,” “Instruction on how to perform the behavior,” “Prompts/cues,” “Behavior practice/rehearsal,” “Graded tasks,” and “Self-reward.” Fidelity was only documented in one study. Good evidence was found for behavior change maintenance effects in healthy inactive adults, and underlying BCTs. This review provides translational evidence to improve research, intervention design, and service delivery in physical activity interventions, while highlighting the lack of fidelity measurement.
机译:缺乏运动和久坐的行为分别与不良的健康状况有关。健康,不活跃的成年人是预防的主要目标人群。这项系统的回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估体育活动和/或久坐的行为干预措施的有效性,在干预后(行为改变)和随访(行为改变维持)方面进行测量,以识别其中的行为改变技术(BCT),以及报告保真度。纳入的研究是针对健康的不活跃成年人的随机对照试验,旨在改变身体活动和/或久坐的行为,干预后的最少随访期为6个月,使用了1990年以来的16个数据库。两名评价者对偏倚风险进行了独立编码,“ “干预描述和复制模板”(TIDieR)清单和BCT。共纳入26项研究。汇集了16项进行荟萃分析。体育活动干预可以有效地改变行为(d = 0.32,95%置信区间= 0.16-0.48,n = 2,346),并在6个月或更长时间后保持行为改变(d = 0.21,95%置信区间= 0.12-0.30,n = 2,190)。久坐行为干预(n = 2)无效。干预后,体育活动干预的有效性与BCT的“生物反馈”,“行为证明”,“行为练习/演练”和“分级任务”相关。在后续行动中,有效性与使用“行动计划”,“如何执行行为的说明”,“提示/提示”,“行为练习/演练”,“分级任务”和“自我奖励”相关。保真度仅在一项研究中记录。在健康的不活跃成年人和潜在的BCT中,发现了行为改变维持作用的良好证据。这篇综述提供了转化证据,以改善体育活动干预措施中的研究,干预措施设计和服务提供,同时强调了缺乏保真度测量的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号