首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Neurophysiology >Voluntary Breathing Influences Corticospinal Excitability of Nonrespiratory Finger Muscles
【2h】

Voluntary Breathing Influences Corticospinal Excitability of Nonrespiratory Finger Muscles

机译:自愿呼吸影响非呼吸性手指肌肉的皮质脊髓兴奋性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study aimed to investigate neurophysiologic mechanisms mediating the newly discovered phenomenon of respiratory–motor interactions and to explore its potential clinical application for motor recovery. First, young and healthy subjects were instructed to breathe normally (NORM); to exhale (OUT) or inhale (IN) as fast as possible in a self-paced manner; or to voluntarily hold breath (HOLD). In experiment 1 (n = 14), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied during 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) finger flexion force production or at rest. The motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor digitorum communis (EDC), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles. Similarly, in experiment 2 (n = 11), electrical stimulation (ES) was applied to FDS or EDC during the described four breathing conditions while subjects maintained 10%MVC of finger flexion or extension and at rest. In the exploratory clinical experiments (experiment 3), four patients with chronic neurological disorders (three strokes, one traumatic brain injury) received a 30-min session of breathing-controlled ES to the impaired EDC. In experiment 1, the EDC MEP magnitudes increased significantly during IN and OUT at both 10%MVC and rest; the FDS MEPs were enhanced only at 10%MVC, whereas the ADM MEP increased only during OUT, compared with NORM for both at rest and 10%MVC. No difference was found between NORM and HOLD for all three muscles. In experiment 2, when FDS was stimulated, force response was enhanced during both IN and OUT, but only at 10%MVC. When EDC was stimulated, force response increased at both 10%MVC and rest, only during IN, but not OUT. The averaged response latency was 83 ms for the finger extensors and 79 ms for the finger flexors. After a 30-min intervention of ES to EDC triggered by forced inspiration in experiment 3, we observed a significant reduction in finger flexor spasticity. The spasticity reduction lasted for ≥4 wk in all four patients. TMS and ES data, collectively, support the phenomenon that there is an overall respiration-related enhancement on the motor system, with a strong inspiration–finger extension coupling during voluntary breathing. As such, breathing-controlled electrical stimulation (i.e., stimulation to finger extensors delivered during the voluntary inspiratory phase) could be applied for enhancing finger extension strength and finger flexor spasticity reduction in poststroke patients.
机译:本研究旨在研究介导新发现的呼吸-运动相互作用现象的神经生理机制,并探讨其在运动恢复中的潜在临床应用。首先,指导年轻健康的受试者正常呼吸(NORM);以自定进度尽可能快地呼气(OUT)或吸气(IN);或自愿屏住呼吸(保持)。在实验1(n = 14)中,经颅磁刺激(TMS)在产生最大10%的自愿收缩(MVC)手指屈曲力或静止时进行。从浅指屈肌(FDS),指伸伸肌(EDC)和小指外展肌(ADM)肌肉记录运动诱发电位(MEP)。类似地,在实验2(n = 11)中,在上述四个呼吸条件下,将电刺激(ES)应用于FDS或EDC,同时受试者保持手指弯曲或伸展的10%MVC并保持静止。在探索性临床实验(实验3)中,四名患有慢性神经系统疾病(三招,一例颅脑外伤)的患者接受了30分钟的呼吸控制ES治疗,以治疗受损的EDC。在实验1中,在10%MVC和静止时,EDC MEP幅度在输入和输出期间均显着增加; FDS MEP仅在10%MVC时增强,而ADM MEP仅在OUT期间增加,而静止和10%MVC时均高于NORM。对于所有三块肌肉,NORM和HOLD之间没有发现差异。在实验2中,当FDS受到刺激时,力响应在输入和输出期间均得到增强,但仅在10%MVC时。当刺激EDC时,仅在IN期间,而在OUT期间,力响应在10%MVC和休息时都增加。手指伸肌的平均反应潜伏期为83毫秒,而手指屈伸的平均反应潜伏期为79毫秒。在实验3中,通过强迫吸气触发ES对EDC进行了30分钟的干预后,我们发现手指屈肌痉挛明显减少。所有四名患者的痉挛减少持续≥4 wk。 TMS和ES数据共同支持以下现象:运动系统整体上与呼吸有关的增强,以及在自愿呼吸过程中强烈的吸气-手指伸展耦合。这样,可以将呼吸控制的电刺激(即,对在自愿吸气阶段递送的手指伸肌进行刺激)用于增强中风后患者的手指伸展强度和手指屈肌痉挛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号