首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Korean Medical Science >Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections
【2h】

Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections

机译:耐亚胺培南的铜绿假单胞菌:医院感染的危险因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for nosocomial infections of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IRPA). A prospective case-control study was performed at a tertiary care hospital in Ankara from January to December 2004. The patients with nosocomial P. aeruginosa infection were included in the study. The features of the patients with IRPA infections were compared to those with imipenem-sensitive P. aeruginosa (ISPA) infections. Only the first isolation of P. aeruginosa was considered. Nosocomial infections were defined according to Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria. IRPA was isolated from 75 (44.1%) patients, and ISPA was isolated from 95 (55.9%) patients during the study period. IRPA were most frequently isolated from endotracheal aspirate (19%) cultures (p=0.048), whereas ISPA were most frequently isolated from urine (28%) cultures (p=0.023). In multivariate analysis, a longer duration of hospital stay until P. aeruginosa isolation (odds ratio [OR], 1.027; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.002-1.054, p=0.034), arterial catheter administration (OR, 2.508; 95% CI, 1.062-5.920, p=0.036), vancomycin (OR, 2.882; 95% CI, 1.130-7.349, p=0.027), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 6.425; 95% CI, 2.187-18.875, p=0.001), and imipenem (OR, 3.580; 95% CI, 1.252-10.245, p=0.017) treatment within the 14 days before isolation of IRPA were independently associated with imipenem resistance. It was concluded that treatment with imipenem, vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam were major risk factors for IRPA infections in hospitalized patients. The nosocomial occurrence of IRPA was also strongly related to the duration of hospital stay, arterial catheter administration.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定对亚胺培南耐药的铜绿假单胞菌(IRPA)医院感染的危险因素。 2004年1月至2004年12月在安卡拉的一家三级医院进行了一项前瞻性病例对照研究。该研究包括了医院内铜绿假单胞菌感染的患者。将IRPA感染患者的特征与对亚胺培南敏感的铜绿假单胞菌(ISPA)感染的患者进行比较。仅考虑了铜绿假单胞菌的首次分离。根据疾病控制中心(CDC)的标准定义医院感染。在研究期间,从75位(44.1%)患者中分离出IRPA,从95位(55.9%)患者中分离出ISPA。 IRPA最常从气管内抽吸物(19%)培养物中分离(p = 0.048),而ISPA最常从尿液中培养(28%)培养物中分离(p = 0.023)。在多变量分析中,直到铜绿假单胞菌分离之前住院时间更长(几率[OR],1.027; 95%置信区间[CI],1.002-1.054,p = 0.034),动脉导管给药(OR,2.508; 95) %CI,1.062-5.920,p = 0.036),万古霉素(OR,2.882; 95%CI,1.130-7.349,p = 0.027),哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(OR,6.425; 95%CI,2.187-18.875,p = 0.001) )和亚胺培南(OR,3.580; 95%CI,1.252-10.245,p = 0.017)治疗在隔离IRPA之前的14天内分别与亚胺培南耐药相关。结论是亚胺培南,万古霉素和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗是住院患者IRPA感染的主要危险因素。 IRPA的医院内发生也与住院时间,动脉导管给药时间密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号