首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Womens Health >Analysis and Reporting of Sex Differences in Phase III Medical Device Clinical Trials—How Are We Doing?
【2h】

Analysis and Reporting of Sex Differences in Phase III Medical Device Clinical Trials—How Are We Doing?

机译:第三阶段医疗器械临床试验中性别差异的分析和报告-我们如何做?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past decade, the scientific community has begun to recognize the importance of biological sex differences in disease pathology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment; however, the practice of sex-specific analysis and reporting is not integrated as standard practice by either our federal health agencies or by major medical journals. Despite the reforms of 20 years ago and the general inclusion of women in drug clinical trials, we have yet to see data routinely analyzed and reported by sex. Major journals are not requiring it, and large, publicly available datasets, such as , are not systematically collecting and pointing to it. However, federal health databases and medical journals have the potential to impact progress in sex-specific analysis and reporting. We conducted a search on for phase III device clinical trials and assessed their practice of sex differences evaluation. Reporting of clinical trial results by sex will maximize scientific value of research investments, significantly impact clinical decision-making, and transform medical care.
机译:在过去的十年中,科学界已经开始认识到生物学性别差异在疾病病理,诊断,预防和治疗中的重要性;但是,我们的联邦卫生机构或主要医学杂志并未将针对性别的分析和报告行为作为标准行为进行整合。尽管进行了20年前的改革,并且在药物临床试验中普遍纳入了女性,但我们尚未看到按性别进行常规分析和报告的数据。主要期刊都不需要它,并且诸如的大型公共可用数据集也没有系统地收集和指向它。但是,联邦卫生数据库和医学期刊有可能影响针对性别的分析和报告的进展。我们进行了III期设备临床试验的搜索,并评估了他们的性别差异评估实践。按性别报告临床试验结果将最大程度地提高研究投资的科学价值,对临床决策产生重大影响,并改变医疗服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号