首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Molecular and Clinical Oncology >Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bevacizumab has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when combined with chemotherapy. Several randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy and toxicity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against bevacizumab have been reported. The present meta-analysis was conducted to identify the potentially significant benefit of the combined treatment regimens in patients with mCRC. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials published on or before September 2014, which compared the efficacy and toxicity of VEGFR TKIs with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. The primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were the toxicity profiles. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for response rate and adverse events (AEs) were calculated, as well as hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS. The final analysis included 4 studies comprising a total of 1,929 intent-to-treat patients with mCRC, which compared VEGFR TKIs (cediranib and axitinib) plus chemotherapy with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Results demonstrated that VEGFR TKIs plus chemotherapy significantly resulted in a modest but significantly shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00–1.25; P=0.05] compared with that of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy but not in OS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.88–1.17; P=0.87) and ORR (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85–1.05; P=0.30). VEGFR TKIs treatment showed a less favorable AE profile compared with bevacizumab, with higher rates of grade-III/IV diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with the bevacizumab group was observed. In conclusion, the addition of VEGFR TKIs to chemotherapy resulted in a modest but significantly shorter PFS but not in OS and ORR compared with bevacizumab. The VEGFR TKIs group showed a less favorable AE profile with higher rates of diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy associated with the bevacizumab was observed.
机译:贝伐单抗与化学疗法联用已证明在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中具有生存优势。已有几项随机临床试验比较了血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)对贝伐单抗的疗效和毒性。进行本荟萃分析,以确定联合治疗方案对mCRC患者的潜在重大益处。搜索PubMed,Embase和Cochrane库数据库,以查找2014年9月或之前发表的随机对照试验,该试验比较了VEGFR TKI与贝伐单抗联合化疗对mCRC患者的疗效和毒性。主要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS)和总缓解率(ORR),次要终点为毒性曲线。计算出反应率和不良事件(AE)的相对风险(RRs)为95%置信区间(CIs),以及PFS和OS的危险比(HRs)。最终分析包括4项研究,包括总共1,929例mCRC意图治疗患者,他们比较了VEGFR TKI(西地尼布和阿昔替尼)加化疗与贝伐单抗加化疗。结果表明,VEGFR TKIs联合化疗可显着降低PFS,但显着缩短[危险比(HR),1.12; 95%CI,1.00–1.25; P = 0.05]与贝伐单抗联合化疗相比,但OS方面无差异(HR,1.10; 95%CI,0.88-1.17; P = 0.87)和ORR(RR,0.95; 95%CI,0.85-1.05; P = 0.30 )。与贝伐单抗相比,VEGFR TKIs治疗显示不良的AE状况,III / IV级腹泻,疲劳,高血压,中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少症的发生率更高,而与贝伐单抗组相关的周围神经病变的发生率更高。总之,与贝伐单抗相比,在化疗中添加VEGFR TKIs可使PFS适度但明显缩短,但OS和ORR却没有。 VEGFR TKIs组显示不良的AE状况,腹泻,疲劳,高血压,中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少症的发生率更高,而观察到与贝伐单抗相关的周围神经病变的发生率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号