首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Accuracy of Combined Computed Tomography Colonography and Dual Energy Iiodine Map Imaging for Detecting Colorectal masses using High-pitch Dual-source CT
【2h】

Accuracy of Combined Computed Tomography Colonography and Dual Energy Iiodine Map Imaging for Detecting Colorectal masses using High-pitch Dual-source CT

机译:结合计算机断层扫描结肠摄影术和双能量碘图成像技术的高音高双源CT检测结直肠肿块的准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of combined computed tomography colonography (CTC) and dual-energy iodine map imaging for detecting colorectal masses using high-pitch dual-source CT, compared with optical colonography (OC) and histopathologic findings. Twenty-eight consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients were underwent contrast-enhanced CTC acquisition using dual-energy mode and OC and pathologic examination. The size of the space-occupied mass, the CT value after contrast enhancement, and the iodine value were measured and statistically compared. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate, and positive predictive and negative predictive values of dual-energy contrast-enhanced CTC were calculated and compared between conventional CTC and dual-energy iodine images. The iodine value of stool was significantly lower than the colonic neoplasia (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of conventional CTC was 95.6% (95% CI = 77.9%–99.2%), combined CTC and dual-energy iodine maps imaging was 95.6% (95% CI = 77.9%–99.2%). The specificity of the two methods was 42.8% (95% CI = 15.4%–93.5%) and 100% (95% CI = 47.9%–100%; P = 0.02), respectively. Compared with optical colonography and histopathology, combined CTC and dual-energy iodine maps imaging can distinguish stool and colonic neoplasia, distinguish between benign and malignant tumors initially and improve the diagnostic accuracy of CTC for colorectal cancer screening.
机译:为了评估结合计算机断层扫描结肠摄影术(CTC)和双能碘地图成像使用高螺距双源CT检测结直肠肿块的诊断准确性,与光学结肠摄影术(OC)和组织病理学发现进行比较。前瞻性地招募了28位连续患者。所有患者均采用双能模式,OC和病理检查进行对比增强的CTC采集。测量并统计比较空间占用质量的大小,对比增强后的CT值和碘值。计算并比较了常规CTC和双能碘图像对双能对比增强CTC的敏感性,特异性,准确率以及阳性预测值和阴性预测值。粪便的碘值显着低于结肠癌(P <0.01)。常规CTC的敏感性为95.6%(95%CI = 77.9%–99.2%),组合的CTC和双能碘图成像为95.6%(95%CI = 77.9%–99.2%)。两种方法的特异性分别为42.8%(95%CI = 15.4%–93.5%)和100%(95%CI = 47.9%–100%; P = 0.02)。与光学结肠造影和组织病理学相比,CTC和双能碘地图的组合成像可以区分粪便和结肠肿瘤,初步区分良性和恶性肿瘤,并提高CTC对大肠癌筛查的诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号