首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Thorax >Physiological effects of flow and pressure triggering during non- invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
【2h】

Physiological effects of flow and pressure triggering during non- invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者无创机械通气期间流量和压力触发的生理效应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: The effect of the type of trigger system on inspiratory effort has been studied in intubated patients, but no data are available in non-invasive mechanical ventilation where the "trigger variable" may be even more important since assisted modes of ventilation are often employed from the beginning of mechanical ventilation. METHODS: The effect of flow triggering (1 and 5 1/min) and pressure triggering (-1 cm H2O) on inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation (PSV) and assisted controlled mode (A/C) delivered non-invasively with a full face mask were compared in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recovering from an acute exacerbation. The patients were studied during randomised 15 minute runs at zero positive end expiratory pressure (ZEEP). The oesophageal pressure time product (PTPoes), dynamic intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi,dyn), fall in maximal airway pressure (delta Paw) during inspiration, and ventilatory variables were measured. RESULTS: Minute ventilation, respiratory pattern, dynamic lung compliance and resistances, and changes in end expiratory lung volume (delta EELV) were the same with the two triggering systems. The total PTPoes and its pre-triggering phase (PTP due to PEEPi and PTP due to valve opening) were significantly higher during both PSV and A/C with pressure triggering than with flow triggering at both levels of sensitivity. delta Paw was larger during pressure triggering, and PEEPi,dyn was significantly reduced during flow triggering in the A/C mode only. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COPD flow triggering reduces the inspiratory effort during both PSV and A/C modes compared with pressure triggering. These findings are likely to be due to a reduction in PEEPi,dyn and in the time of valve opening with a flow trigger.


机译:背景:已在插管患者中研究了触发系统类型对吸气努力的影响,但无创机械通气方面尚无可用数据,其中“触发变量”可能更为重要,因为通常采用辅助通气模式从机械通风开始。方法:流量触发(1和5 1 / min)和压力触发(-1 cm H2O)对压力支持通气(PSV)和辅助控制模式(A / C)在无创的情况下进行全力吸气时的吸气量从急性发作中恢复的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中比较了口罩。在零正末呼气压力(ZEEP)的情况下,在随机15分钟的跑步过程中对患者进行了研究。吸气过程中的食道压力时间乘积(PTPoes),动态固有PEEP(PEEPi,dyn),最大气道压力下降(delta Paw)以及通气量均经过测量。结果:两个触发系统的分钟通气,呼吸模式,动态肺顺应性和阻力以及呼气末肺体积的变化(EELV增量)相同。在PSV和A / C中,在触发压力的情况下,总的PTPoes及其预触发阶段(由于PEEPi而导致的PTP和由于阀打开而引起的PTP)在两个灵敏度级别上均显着高于流量触发。仅在A / C模式下,在触发压力时,ΔPaw较大,而在触发流量时,PEEPi,dyn显着降低。结论:与压力触发相比,COPD患者在PSV和A / C模式下,流量触发可减少吸气量。这些发现可能是由于PEEPi,dyn的减少以及带流量触发的阀门打开时间的减少。


著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号