首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics >Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
【2h】

Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources

机译:胚胎干细胞的潜力:即使使用其他干细胞来源也存在伦理问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The recent discussions about alternative sources of human embryonic stem cells (White Paper of the US President's Council on Bioethics, 2005), while stirring new interest in the developmental potential of the various abnormal embryos or constructs proposed as such sources, also raise questions about the potential of the derived embryonic stem cells. The data on the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells that seem relevant for ethical considerations and aspects of patentability are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the meaning of “totipotency, omnipotency and pluripotency” as illustrated by a comparison of the developmental potential of three‐dimensional clusters of blastomeres (morula), embryonic stem cells, somatic or (adult) stem cells or other somatic (non‐stem) cells. This paper focuses on embryoid bodies and on direct cloning by tetraploid complementation. Usage and patenting of these cells cannot be considered to be ethically sound as long as totipotency and tetraploid complementability of embryonic stem cells are not excluded for the specific cell line in question. Testing this poses an ethical problem in itself and needs to be discussed in the future.
机译:最近有关人类胚胎干细胞替代来源的讨论(美国总统生物伦理学理事会白皮书,2005年)在激起人们对各种异常胚胎或提议作为此类来源的构建体发展潜力的新兴趣的同时,也提出了关于胚胎干细胞的潜力。讨论了关于胚胎干细胞发育潜能的数据,这些数据似乎与道德考量和可专利性有关。通过比较卵裂球(桑ula鼠),胚胎干细胞,体细胞或(成人)干细胞或其他体细胞(非干细胞)。本文着重于类胚体和通过四倍体互补的直接克隆。只要不排除所讨论的特定细胞系的胚胎干细胞的全能性和四倍体互补性,就不能认为这些细胞的使用和专利在伦理上是合理的。测试这本身就构成了一个道德问题,将来需要讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号