首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Olanzapine plus aprepitant palonosetron and dexamethasone for nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline: A retrospective study
【2h】

Olanzapine plus aprepitant palonosetron and dexamethasone for nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline: A retrospective study

机译:奥氮平加阿瑞匹坦帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松治疗接受蒽环类抗生素的恶心和呕吐的患者回顾性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to compare the antiemetic efficacy and safety of a four-drug combination with those of a standard three-drug combination in Japanese patients with breast cancer treated with anthracycline. We retrospectively analyzed data from Japanese patients with breast cancer, who had received their first cycle of anthracycline and were treated with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone with or without olanzapine. This retrospective observational study was performed at Ehime University Hospital using the electronic medical records. Multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses were performed to compare the onset of complete response (CR) failure between the groups. One-hundred and thirty patients were included in this study and the four- and three-drug group had 22 and 108 patients, respectively. Similar to multivariable logistic regression analysis, propensity-adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that the four-drug group was markedly associated with a decreased odds of CR failure in the overall, acute, and delayed phases (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10–0.73; OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10–0.76; and OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.57, respectively). Additionally, treatment-related adverse events were well tolerated in both the groups. These findings suggest that the antiemetic efficacy of the four-drug combination is superior to that of the standard three-drug combination.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较四药联用和标准三药联用在日本蒽环类药物治疗的乳腺癌患者中的止吐功效和安全性。我们回顾性分析了来自日本乳腺癌患者的数据,这些患者已接受了蒽环类药物的第一个周期治疗,并接受了阿瑞匹坦,帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松联合或不联合奥氮平治疗。这项回顾性观察研究是在爱媛大学医院使用电子病历进行的。进行了多变量和倾向评分调整的分析,以比较两组之间完全反应(CR)失败的发生。这项研究包括一百三十名患者,四药和三药组分别有22名和108名患者。与多变量logistic回归分析类似,倾向性调整的logistic回归分析显示,在全部,急性和延迟阶段,四药组与CR失败几率显着相关(优势比[OR]:0.27,95%置信区间[CI]:0.10-0.73; OR:0.28,95%CI:0.10-0.76; OR:0.15,95%CI:0.04-0.57)。另外,两组的治疗相关不良事件耐受性都很好。这些发现表明,四药组合的止吐功效优于标准三药组合的止吐功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号