首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncology Letters >Clinical effectiveness of combined interventional therapy as a salvage modality for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma
【2h】

Clinical effectiveness of combined interventional therapy as a salvage modality for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

机译:联合介入治疗作为不可切除胰腺癌的救治方式的临床效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although different treatment methods have been introduced to treat advanced pancreatic carcinoma, the median overall survival rate remains unsatisfactory. Theoretically, combining different treatment methods should work in synergy to enhance locoregional disease control and improve survival. Therefore, the aim of the present retrospective study was to analyze the effectiveness of combined interventional therapy compared with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or chemotherapy alone for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. A total of 266 patients who were undergoing treatment for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma between July 2012 and November 2015 were included in the current study. The tumor responses and 3-year overall survival rates of patients treated with combined interventional therapy (TACE combined with iodine-125 seed implantation and/or radiofrequency ablation; CIT group; n=84) were compared with those of patients treated with TACE alone (TACE group; n=59), as well as patients treated with systemic chemotherapy alone (control group; n=123). Patients in the CIT group exhibited significantly improved tumor responses compared with patients in the TACE group (51.89 vs. 30.61%; P=0.028) or control group (51.89 vs. 17.20%; P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival rate of the CIT group was also significantly higher compared with that of the TACE and control groups (P=0.0116 and P=0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, the CIT group exhibited a significantly higher overall survival rate for patients with unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer compared with the TACE and control groups (P=0.0088 and P<0.0001, respectively), which suggests that a combination of different interventional techniques increases the survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. No life-threatening complications were observed in any treatment group. In conclusion, combined interventional therapy exhibits a good efficacy and an improved survival rate for unresectable pancreatic cancer compared with TACE alone.
机译:尽管已经引入了不同的治疗方法来治疗晚期胰腺癌,但是中位总生存率仍然不能令人满意。从理论上讲,结合不同的治疗方法应协同工作,以增强局部疾病的控制和提高生存率。因此,本回顾性研究的目的是分析与单纯经动脉化学栓塞术(TACE)或单纯化疗相比,联合介入治疗对于不可切除的胰腺癌的有效性。 2012年7月至2015年11月期间共接受治疗的266例不可切除的胰腺癌患者被纳入本研究。将联合介入治疗(TACE联合碘125粒子植入和/或射频消融; CIT组; n = 84)与单独接受TACE治疗的患者的肿瘤反应和3年总生存率进行比较( TACE组; n = 59),以及仅接受全身化疗的患者(对照组; n = 123)。与TACE组(51.89 vs. 30.61%; P = 0.028)或对照组(51.89 vs. 17.20%; P <0.001)相比,CIT组患者的肿瘤反应显着改善。与TACE组和对照组相比,CIT组的3年总生存率也显着更高(分别为P = 0.0116和P = 0.0001)。此外,与TACE组和对照组相比,CIT组对无法切除的转移性胰腺癌患者的总生存率显着更高(分别为P = 0.0088和P <0.0001),这表明不同干预技术的组合可提高生存率不可切除的胰腺癌患者在任何治疗组中均未观察到威胁生命的并发症。总之,与单独的TACE相比,联合介入治疗对不可切除的胰腺癌具有良好的疗效和更高的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号