首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SpringerPlus >A review method for UML requirements analysis model employing system-side prototyping
【2h】

A review method for UML requirements analysis model employing system-side prototyping

机译:系统侧原型的UML需求分析模型的评审方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

User interface prototyping is an effective method for users to validate the requirements defined by analysts at an early stage of a software development. However, a user interface prototype system offers weak support for the analysts to verify the consistency of the specifications about internal aspects of a system such as business logic. As the result, the inconsistency causes a lot of rework costs because the inconsistency often makes the developers impossible to actualize the system based on the specifications. For verifying such consistency, functional prototyping is an effective method for the analysts, but it needs a lot of costs and more detailed specifications. In this paper, we propose a review method so that analysts can verify the consistency among several different kinds of diagrams in UML efficiently by employing system-side prototyping without the detailed model. The system-side prototype system does not have any functions to achieve business logic, but visualizes the results of the integration among the diagrams in UML as Web pages. The usefulness of our proposal was evaluated by applying our proposal into a development of Library Management System (LMS) for a laboratory. This development was conducted by a group. As the result, our proposal was useful for discovering the serious inconsistency caused by the misunderstanding among the members of the group.
机译:用户界面原型是用户在软件开发的早期阶段验证分析师定义的需求的有效方法。但是,用户界面原型系统为分析人员提供了薄弱的支持,以验证有关系统内部方面(如业务逻辑)的规范的一致性。结果,不一致会导致大量的返工成本,因为不一致常常使开发人员无法根据规格实现该系统。为了验证这种一致性,功能原型对于分析人员是一种有效的方法,但它需要大量成本和更详细的规范。在本文中,我们提出了一种审查方法,以便分析人员可以在不使用详细模型的情况下,通过使用系统侧原型来有效地验证UML中几种不同图之间的一致性。系统端原型系统不具有实现业务逻辑的任何功能,而是将UML中的图之间的集成结果可视化为Web页面。通过将我们的建议应用到实验室的图书馆管理系统(LMS)的开发中,对我们建议的有用性进行了评估。此开发是由一个小组进行的。结果,我们的建议对于发现由小组成员之间的误解引起的严重不一致是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号