首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SpringerPlus >Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods
【2h】

Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods

机译:肢体体积测量:比较最常用的当前方法的准确性和决定性参数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Limb volume measurements are used for evaluating growth of muscle mass and effectivity of strength training. Beside sport sciences, it is used e.g. for detection of oedemas, lymphedemas or carcinomas or for examinations of muscle atrophy. There are several commonly used methods, but there is a lack of clear comparison, which shows their advantages and limits. The accuracy of each method is uncertainly estimated only. The aim of this paper is to determine and experimentally verify their accuracy and compare them among each other. Water Displacement Method (WD), three methods based on circumferential measures—Frustum Sign Model (FSM), Disc Model (DM), Partial Frustum Model (PFM) and two 3D scan based methods Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were compared. Precise reference cylinders and limbs of two human subjects were measured 10 times by each method. Personal dependency of methods was also tested by measuring 10 times the same object by 3 different people. Accuracies: WD 0.3 %, FSM 2–8 % according person, DM, PFM 1–8 %, MRI 2 % (hand) or 8 % (finger), CT 0.5 % (hand) or 2 % (finger);times: FSM 1 min, CT 7 min, WD, DM, PFM 15 min, MRI 19 min; and more. WD was found as the best method for most of uses with best accuracy. The CT disposes with almost the same accuracy and allows measurements of specific regions (e.g. particular muscles), as same as MRI, which accuracy is worse though, but it is not harmful. Frustum Sign Model is usable for very fast estimation of limb volume, but with lower accuracy, Disc Model and Partial Frustum Model is useful in cases when Water Displacement cannot be used.
机译:肢体体积测量用于评估肌肉质量的增长和力量训练的有效性。除了运动科学,它还用于用于检测水肿,淋巴水肿或癌或检查肌肉萎缩。有几种常用的方法,但是缺乏明确的比较,这表明了它们的优点和局限性。只能不确定地估计每种方法的准确性。本文的目的是确定并通过实验验证其准确性,并相互比较。排水法(WD),三种基于周向量度的方法-视锥符号模型(FSM),圆盘模型(DM),部分视锥模型(PFM)和两种基于3D扫描的方法计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI) )进行比较。通过两种方法对两个人类受试者的精确参考圆柱和四肢进行10次测量。方法的个人依赖性也通过3个不同的人测量同一对象的10倍来进行测试。准确度:WD 0.3%,FSM 2-8%(按人员),DM,PFM 1-8%,MRI 2%(手)或8%(手指),CT 0.5%(手)或2%(手指);次: FSM 1分钟,CT 7分钟,WD,DM,PFM 15分钟,MRI 19分钟;和更多。发现WD是大多数用途中精度最高的最佳方法。与MRI一样,CT的处置精度几乎相同,并且可以测量特定区域(例如特定的肌肉),尽管准确性较差,但无害。截锥体符号模型可用于非常快速地估计肢体体积,但在无法使用排水功能的情况下,圆盘模型和局部截锥体模型具有较低的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号